Asymmetric pay-for-performance in Chinese enterprises: Insights from firm-specific and cross-sectional analyses

The study examines wage rigidity and its connection to the pay-for-performance sensitivity (PPS) of Chinese chief executive officers (CEOs). We find that Chinese CEOs are compensated for both recurring and non-recurring business gains but are shielded from losses. The asymmetrical effects of gains and losses are differentiated between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-SOEs, as well as between central and local SOEs. By incorporating corporate governance mechanisms, we find that the CEO compensation is aligned with the efficient contracting hypothesis in SOEs, but fails to find evidence in non-SOEs. The data source is the China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database (CSMAR). Our research design involves cross-sectional analyses of 33,166 firm-year observations in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2005 to 2021 and firm-specific regressions on a sub-sample of 841 firms with a tenure exceeding 15 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Ownership and Control
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv22i3art7
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetric pay-for-performance in Chinese enterprises: Insights from firm-specific and cross-sectional analyses

Jasmine Yur‐Austin, Qi Zhang, Xiaoying Chen, He Dan
Corporate Ownership and Control
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Asymmetric pay-for-performance in Chinese enterprises: Insights from firm-specific and cross-sectional analyses

Jasmine Yur‐Austin, Qi Zhang, Xiaoying Chen, He Dan
article en

Abstract

The study examines wage rigidity and its connection to the pay-for-performance sensitivity (PPS) of Chinese chief executive officers (CEOs). We find that Chinese CEOs are compensated for both recurring and non-recurring business gains but are shielded from losses. The asymmetrical effects of gains and losses are differentiated between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-SOEs, as well as between central and local SOEs. By incorporating corporate governance mechanisms, we find that the CEO compensation is aligned with the efficient contracting hypothesis in SOEs, but fails to find evidence in non-SOEs. The data source is the China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database (CSMAR). Our research design involves cross-sectional analyses of 33,166 firm-year observations in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2005 to 2021 and firm-specific regressions on a sub-sample of 841 firms with a tenure exceeding 15 years.

Corporate Ownership and ControlVol. 22(3)
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), California State University, Long Beach (US)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Asymmetric pay-for-performance in Chinese enterprises: Insights from firm-specific and cross-sectional analyses — Jasmine Yur‐Austin, Qi Zhang, et al. · Corporate Ownership and Control (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS