Gun Rights and Gun Violence: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the USA, Japan, and Bangladesh

This paper presents a comparative legal analysis of gun rights and gun violence across three distinct jurisdictions: the United States, Japan, and Bangladesh. It examines how constitutional, statutory, and regulatory frameworks shape the legal status of firearm ownership and influence gun-related crime and mortality. The study mostly focused on the United States, with its constitutional right to bear arms enshrined in the Second Amendment, experiences significantly higher rates of gun violence compared to Japan and Bangladesh, where strict gun control laws prevail. Japan’s rigorous licensing procedures and cultural attitudes contribute to one of the lowest firearm-related death rates globally, while Bangladesh, despite legal restrictions, faces challenges in enforcement and illegal possession. Finally, by analyzing legal texts, empirical data, and policy outcomes, the authors sought to highlight the intricate relationship between gun legislation, societal norms, and public safety. Most importantly, the study concludes with policy recommendations tailored to each country’s legal context and socio-political environment to balance individual rights with collective security.