Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation in MRI Protocol Selection: Balancing Accuracy and Privacy
Motivation: When medical staff lack clinical experience, they might pick the wrong protocols and parameters, leading to wasted time and resources. Goal(s): We want to show that combining RAG technology with LLMs can help determine MRI protocols at a level matching seasoned professionals —all while keeping patient privacy intact. Approach: Using clinical doctors' MRI exam requests as our benchmark, we compared accuracy across different experience levels and professions to see how cloud-based and local LLMs differ in performance. Results: After adding RAG technology, the cloud-based LLM matched the expertise of experienced radiologists, while the local LLM reached accuracy similar to that of senior radiologic technologists. Impact: We've proven that RAG-based LLMs are feasible for early MRI decision-making, offering a new tool for learning and error prevention. Cloud-based LLMs and local LLMs each have their strengths in accuracy and privacy, but neither is perfect just yet.
Authors
- Shaoxun Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-6720)
- Percy Liang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-6139)
- Wenzhun Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0766-237X)
- Chunming Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-851X)
- Insik Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-1250)
- Jason C. Hsu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-0403)
- Yong Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4470-3328)
- Jun Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3114-8457)
- Yuhan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-2345)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/3377
- Primary Topic
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00