Moving Beyond Single-Model Assumptions in DCE-MRI: Probabilistic Nested Model Selection for Enhanced Tumor Microvasculature Analysis
Motivation: The current nested model selection (NMS) method for pharmacokinetic analysis of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI data assumes a single physiological model per voxel, potentially overlooking mixed-model scenarios in complex tissues like tumors. Goal(s): To develop a probabilistic NMS (PNMS) technique that estimates voxel-wise probabilities of multiple physiological models for more accurate microvasculature parameter estimation in DCE-MRI. Approach: Using DCE-MRI data from a rat glioblastoma model, we employed a Kohonen Self-Organizing Map (K-SOM) to estimate model probabilities and compared them to conventional NMS technique. Results: PNMS provided comparable accuracy, with faster computation and more reliable permeability estimates. Impact: Probabilistic nested model selection has the potential to improve the accuracy of DCE-based microvasculature parameter estimation. It enhanced DCE-MRI based tumor microenvironmental information assessment, that may translate to more precise diagnoses, targeted therapies, and informed clinical decision-making for cancer patients.
Authors
- Kundan Thind (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-6655)
- Stephen R. Brown (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-8448)
- Benjamin Movsas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-9776)
- James R. Ewing (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-0655)
- Indrin J. Chetty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-7053)
- Mohammad M. Ghassemi
- Prabhu Acharya
- Hassan Bagher‐Ebadian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4835-9237)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/3248
- Primary Topic
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00