Keeping a Low (Temperature) Profile: An Analysis of In Vivo RF Heating of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Devices in Low (0.55 T) vs. High-Field (1.5 T) MRI

Motivation: The growing accessibility of low-field MRI systems and the lack of scanning guidelines for VNS devices in these systems highlight a need to assess RF heating risks. Goal(s): To compare the predicted RF-induced heating of a VNS device at 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI, providing insights for safe scanning practices. Approach: We measured the transfer function of a commercial VNS device and used it to simulate in vivo heating at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, varying landmark and B1+ values. Results: Predictions suggest that RF heating at 0.55 T can be comparable to that at 1.5 T. Impact: This study challenges the common belief that low-field MRI is inherently safer for patients with implants, demonstrating that RF heating at 0.55 T can be similar to or exceed that at 1.5 T, underscoring the need for careful patient assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/1329
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping a Low (Temperature) Profile: An Analysis of In Vivo RF Heating of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Devices in Low (0.55 T) vs. High-Field (1.5 T) MRI

Julie G. Pilitsis, Bhumi Bhusal, Nicole Seiberlich, Pia Sanpitak et al.
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

Keeping a Low (Temperature) Profile: An Analysis of In Vivo RF Heating of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Devices in Low (0.55 T) vs. High-Field (1.5 T) MRI

Julie G. Pilitsis, Bhumi Bhusal, Nicole Seiberlich, Pia Sanpitak, Laleh Golestanirad, Fuchang Jiang, Tayeb Zaidi
article en

Abstract

Motivation: The growing accessibility of low-field MRI systems and the lack of scanning guidelines for VNS devices in these systems highlight a need to assess RF heating risks. Goal(s): To compare the predicted RF-induced heating of a VNS device at 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI, providing insights for safe scanning practices. Approach: We measured the transfer function of a commercial VNS device and used it to simulate in vivo heating at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, varying landmark and B1+ values. Results: Predictions suggest that RF heating at 0.55 T can be comparable to that at 1.5 T. Impact: This study challenges the common belief that low-field MRI is inherently safer for patients with implants, demonstrating that RF heating at 0.55 T can be similar to or exceed that at 1.5 T, underscoring the need for careful patient assessment.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.