Sorting out PI-RADS 3: A radiologist-assist tool using representation learning to avoid unnecessary biopsies
Motivation: Although MRI has a high negative predictive value for low-risk prostate cancers (PCa), it suffers from substantially high-number of false-positives for intermediate-risk cases, resulting in unnecessary biopsies. Goal(s): To develop an AI-based framework to detect clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in patients diagnosed as intermediate-risk by radiologists. Approach: We use PI-RADS-guided contrastive learning to generate latent representations from MR images. These serve as a guide to disambiguate PI-RADS3 and provide a tool for identifying potential negative biopsies. Results: We observe performance comparable to radiologists in identifying csPCa. Improved performance is noted in PI-RADS3 assessments where 10-28% negative biopsies can be avoided with appropriate risk-thresholds. Impact: Powered with PI-RADS guided representational learning, deep learning models can provide radiologists with additional information to disambiguate intermediate risk PI-RADS3 assessments, avoiding unnecessary biopsies, and potentially helping patient retention in active surveillance protocols.
Authors
- Lavanya Umapathy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-0930)
- Daniel K. Sodickson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2436-4664)
- Tarun Dutt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7683-4271)
- Angela Tong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-3414)
- Patricia M. Johnson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-9969)
- Hersh Chandarana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-4589)
- Sumit Chopra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6637-2230)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/0807
- Primary Topic
- AI in cancer detection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00