Characterizing differences between white and gray matter T1W-based segmentations at 0.6T and 1.5T

Motivation: Mid-field MRI (0.1-1T) presents an accessible option to clinical brain imaging. Thus, it's essential to determine the measurability of brain tissue volumes at this field strength. Goal(s): This study examines the reliability of tissue segmentation and volume estimations of conventional segmentation methods at 0.6T compared to 1.5T. Approach: T1-weighted scans and re-scans were acquired at 0.6T and 1.5T, these images were reconstructed with both compressed sense and AI. All images were segmented, and these results were analyzed for consistency across conditions. Results: While 0.6T images allowed consistent segmentation, further refinement with advanced approaches, such as deep learning, may enhance accuracy in volume estimation. Impact: This study confirms that mid-field MRI (0.6T) T1-weighted images can be used for white and gray matter segmentation with reproducible volume measures. These findings may enable longitudinal monitoring of brain volume and inspire future research into improved segmentations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/1652
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing differences between white and gray matter T1W-based segmentations at 0.6T and 1.5T

Martijn Nagtegaal, Marius Staring, Yiming Dong, Nicola Pezzotti et al.
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Characterizing differences between white and gray matter T1W-based segmentations at 0.6T and 1.5T

Martijn Nagtegaal, Marius Staring, Yiming Dong, Nicola Pezzotti, Ece Ercan, Matthias J.P. van Osch, Peter Börnert, Andrew Webb, Navid Jabarimani
article en

Abstract

Motivation: Mid-field MRI (0.1-1T) presents an accessible option to clinical brain imaging. Thus, it's essential to determine the measurability of brain tissue volumes at this field strength. Goal(s): This study examines the reliability of tissue segmentation and volume estimations of conventional segmentation methods at 0.6T compared to 1.5T. Approach: T1-weighted scans and re-scans were acquired at 0.6T and 1.5T, these images were reconstructed with both compressed sense and AI. All images were segmented, and these results were analyzed for consistency across conditions. Results: While 0.6T images allowed consistent segmentation, further refinement with advanced approaches, such as deep learning, may enhance accuracy in volume estimation. Impact: This study confirms that mid-field MRI (0.6T) T1-weighted images can be used for white and gray matter segmentation with reproducible volume measures. These findings may enable longitudinal monitoring of brain volume and inspire future research into improved segmentations.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.