Characterizing Interdisciplinary U.S. Hospice Clinician Presence During Patient Self-Administration of Medical Aid in Dying Medication
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite emerging as a clinical and scholarly focus in medical aid in dying (MAID)-related care, limited data exist to characterize hospice clinician presence while patients self-administer the medication to hasten their death. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To explore (1) the proportion and (2) correlates of interdisciplinary hospice clinician presence during patient self-administration of MAID medication. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Exploratory secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Convenience sample of interdisciplinary U.S. hospice clinicians reporting permissive state and organizational MAID policy. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> We assessed the proportion of the sample ever having been present during patient self-administration of MAID medication via frequency and percentage. We examined personal, professional, organizational, and MAID-specific characteristics as correlates via multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for small sample bias. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our sample included 100 hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. Descriptive results revealed that just over one-third of the sample had ever been present during patient self-administration of MAID medication. Regression results indicated that being a chaplain and working for a hospice with a policy permitting full MAID participation were each significantly associated with greater odds of ever having been present. Conversely, never having provided end-of-life care beyond information provision related to a hospice patient's use of MAID was significantly associated with lower odds of ever having been present. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Hospice clinician presence during patient self-administration of MAID medication appears relatively common and related to select professional, organizational, and MAID-specific characteristics. Improved annual state reporting practices and expanded replication efforts are warranted.
Authors
- Stacy M. Fischer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-7576)
- Daniel D. Matlock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642)
- Grant Yoder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-1246)
- Karla T. Washington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-9524)
- Todd Becker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4170-1412)
- Elissa Kozlov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-2352)
- Denae J. Gerasta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-5990)
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Colorado School of Public Health (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US)
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251378209
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88