Reproducibility of T1 and T2 mapping on renal in-vivo data of 3T MRI scanners - a multi-center and multi-vendor study

Motivation: For quantitative MRI (qMRI), evaluating repeatability and reproducibility is vital for tackling the challenges of standardization. Goal(s): Analyse repeatability and reproducibility of T1 mapping and T2 mapping on healthy volunteers. Approach: Multi-site and multi-vendor study using two 3T scanners at two centers. Results: The mean T1 and T2 differences between multiple acquisitions are not significant. T1 and T2 exhibit good repeatability and reproducibility across multiple acquisitions for differnt scanners and sites in healthy volunteers. Impact: To address the standardization challenge of the MR protocol, assessing repeatability and reproducibility is essential. Our findings reveal that T1 and T2 MR biomarkers maintain high repeatability and reproducibility in healthy volunteers across multiple acquisitions

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/5162
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproducibility of T1 and T2 mapping on renal in-vivo data of 3T MRI scanners - a multi-center and multi-vendor study

Anika Strittmatter, Rebeca Echeverría‐Chasco, María A. Fernández‐Seara, Steffen Ringgaard et al.
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Reproducibility of T1 and T2 mapping on renal in-vivo data of 3T MRI scanners - a multi-center and multi-vendor study

Anika Strittmatter, Rebeca Echeverría‐Chasco, María A. Fernández‐Seara, Steffen Ringgaard, Anna Caroli, Lucian-Mihai Itu, Michela Bozzetto, Susan Francis, Nuria Garcı́a-Fernández, Anish Raj, Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen, Frank G. Zöllner, Christoffer Laustsen, Larisa Micu, Leyre García-Ruiz, Giulia Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Malene Aastrup, Siria Pasini, J.A. Gutiérrez, Matias Trillin, Ioana Urdea
article en

Abstract

Motivation: For quantitative MRI (qMRI), evaluating repeatability and reproducibility is vital for tackling the challenges of standardization. Goal(s): Analyse repeatability and reproducibility of T1 mapping and T2 mapping on healthy volunteers. Approach: Multi-site and multi-vendor study using two 3T scanners at two centers. Results: The mean T1 and T2 differences between multiple acquisitions are not significant. T1 and T2 exhibit good repeatability and reproducibility across multiple acquisitions for differnt scanners and sites in healthy volunteers. Impact: To address the standardization challenge of the MR protocol, assessing repeatability and reproducibility is essential. Our findings reveal that T1 and T2 MR biomarkers maintain high repeatability and reproducibility in healthy volunteers across multiple acquisitions

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.