MRI Goes Mobile: Assessing the Reliability and Repeatability of a Mobile vs. Stationary 1.5T MRI for Functional Neuroscience Studies
Motivation: Mobile MRI scanners could transform functional neuroscience research by expanding accessibility to a more diverse population and enabling data collection in remote settings. Goal(s): To assess the reliability and repeatability of a mobile 1.5T MRI scanner compared to a stationary 1.5T scanner. Approach: Three healthy human subjects underwent MRI on both scanners across three days. The mobile scanner was relocated between measurement days to evaluate the impact of scanner movement. B0/B1+ maps, structural MP-RAGE, and functional MRI were acquired and analyzed. Results: The mobile 1.5T scanner demonstrated comparable field homogeneity and structural/functional image quality to the stationary system, with minimal impact from relocation. Impact: Mobile high-field 1.5T MRI scanners can bring neuroscience imaging to underserved areas. This study shows how a mobile scanner, even after relocation, can achieve comparable quality to a stationary scanner expanding the potential for broader functional neuroscience research.
Authors
- Rüdiger Brühl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-5996)
- Davide Santoro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-168X)
- Seyed Amir Mohammadi
- Sonja Sudimac (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-4759)
- Nils Bodammer
- Simone Kühn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6823-7969)
- Caroline Garcia Forlim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-7797)
- Christoph Stefan Aigner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3618-9610)
- Sebastian Schröder
- Katharina Schmalen
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/2504
- Primary Topic
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00