Adapting to climate change on the farm: Experiences of small-scale ecological farmers in two regions of China
While ecological practices are widely recognized as effective strategies for addressing climate change, their adoption among smallholders is significantly influenced by the experiences of early adopters such as small-scale ecological farmers. Despite this important factor in adoption, few empirical studies have examined how small-scale ecological farmers experience climate change and evaluate the effectiveness of their ecological approaches. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews, farm visits and surveys with 28 ecological farmers in China, we develop an integrative analytical framework that uses farmers’ own narratives to examine how they perceive, are impacted by, and respond to climate change at the farm level. We found that beyond direct impacts on crop yield and quality, ecological farm productivity was undermined as climate shocks disrupt agroecosystems, damage farm facilities, and pose health risks to farm workers. In response, farmers apply diverse ecological practices alongside socio-economic measures to build resilience. While the paper demonstrates the adaptive value of ecological practices, it also reveals that their broader and successful adoption among smallholders is contingent upon overcoming substantial economic, social and institutional barriers. The study highlights the potential of bottom-up, farmer-led initiatives and advocates for targeted policies and services tailored specifically to the needs of ecological farmers.
Authors
- Zhenzhong Si (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-9376)
- Steffanie Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4754-246X)
- Qiao Bo Feng
Institutions
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Agriculture and Food (AU)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2025.144.011
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Rural development and sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.83
Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada