Multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study on ADC accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility across 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners

Motivation: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a promising imaging biomarker for tissue characterization, particularly in renal applications. However, diffusion metrics variation across scanners poses challenges for multi-center studies. Goal(s): Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of QIBA validation process for ADC measurements in abdominal setups at 1.5T and 3T across multiple sites and vendors. Approach: In six sites, ADC values were measured on the QIBA/NIST diffusion phantom and compared to reference values, adjusting for temperature. Results: Excellent accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility were found, especially in the renal range. Despite some differences across field strengths and vendors the overall inter-scanner agreement was excellent. Impact: Implementing the QIBA validation process, using standardized protocols across sites and vendors, for diffusion measurements is feasibile in abdominal setups at both 1.5T and 3T. This is a crucial step to enhance reliability in multi-center renal MRI studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/3638
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study on ADC accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility across 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners

Anika Strittmatter, Rebeca Echeverría‐Chasco, María A. Fernández‐Seara, Steffen Ringgaard et al.
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study on ADC accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility across 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners

Anika Strittmatter, Rebeca Echeverría‐Chasco, María A. Fernández‐Seara, Steffen Ringgaard, Anna Caroli, Michela Bozzetto, Susan Francis, Luisa Pierotti, Anish Raj, Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen, Christoffer Laustsen, Matteo Renzulli, Leyre García-Ruiz, Giulia Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Malene Aastrup, Siria Pasini, Frank G. Zoellner
article en

Abstract

Motivation: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a promising imaging biomarker for tissue characterization, particularly in renal applications. However, diffusion metrics variation across scanners poses challenges for multi-center studies. Goal(s): Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of QIBA validation process for ADC measurements in abdominal setups at 1.5T and 3T across multiple sites and vendors. Approach: In six sites, ADC values were measured on the QIBA/NIST diffusion phantom and compared to reference values, adjusting for temperature. Results: Excellent accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility were found, especially in the renal range. Despite some differences across field strengths and vendors the overall inter-scanner agreement was excellent. Impact: Implementing the QIBA validation process, using standardized protocols across sites and vendors, for diffusion measurements is feasibile in abdominal setups at both 1.5T and 3T. This is a crucial step to enhance reliability in multi-center renal MRI studies.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.