Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

Motivation: With the increasing availability of 5.0 T scanners, the feasibility of fat content and iron burden needs to be reevaluated at 5.0 T. Goal(s): To determine the accuracy and consistency of the PDFF and R2* in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle across different magnetic strengths and MR scanners. Approach: 127 participants underwent 3.0 T MRI 1 (uMR 780), 3.0 T MRI 2 (uMR 880), and 5.0 T MRI (uMR Jupiter). Results: The high spatial resolution of 5.0 T MRI improves the quantification accuracy of PDFF and R2* in abdominal multi-organs. Impact: Due to high interfield agreement of the PDFF and R2* with 3.0 T, 5.0 T could be used as a reliable noninvasive biomarker for quantifying fat and iron contents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/4956
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

Yali Li, Hong Yuan
1 citations
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
article

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

Yali Li, Hong Yuan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Motivation: With the increasing availability of 5.0 T scanners, the feasibility of fat content and iron burden needs to be reevaluated at 5.0 T. Goal(s): To determine the accuracy and consistency of the PDFF and R2* in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle across different magnetic strengths and MR scanners. Approach: 127 participants underwent 3.0 T MRI 1 (uMR 780), 3.0 T MRI 2 (uMR 880), and 5.0 T MRI (uMR Jupiter). Results: The high spatial resolution of 5.0 T MRI improves the quantification accuracy of PDFF and R2* in abdominal multi-organs. Impact: Due to high interfield agreement of the PDFF and R2* with 3.0 T, 5.0 T could be used as a reliable noninvasive biomarker for quantifying fat and iron contents.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI — Yali Li, Hong Yuan · Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS