On the optimal analytic approach to luminal water fraction estimation in prostate cancer MRI: Simulations and in vivo validation
Motivation: Accurate luminal water fraction (LWF) estimation in prostate MRI is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, yet traditional NNLS-based model struggle with noise in clinical settings. Goal(s): To evaluate and compare the accuracy, precision, and contrast of various LWF estimation models, focusing on multi-component (MC) models and NNLS-based models. Approach: Simulation studies were conducted across a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and prior knowledge conditions, and further validated using in vivo MRI data from prostate cancer patients. Results: MC-G-4 and MC-D-2 models showed superior accuracy and precision, providing reliable LWF estimates and effectively differentiating tissue types. Impact: The MC-G-4 and MC-D-2 models significantly enhance luminal water fraction estimation in prostate cancer MRI, offering robust, accurate, and noise-resilient tools that improve lesion detection and characterization, thereby potentially leading to better patient outcomes in clinical practice.
Authors
- Steven Cen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7859-8909)
- Qing Kong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9519-8384)
- Jiayu Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-6534)
- Zhaoyang Fan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-2325)
- Jingxiang Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-5973)
- Fei Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9350-6513)
- Chen Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-4067)
- Andrew Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-8080)
- Monish Aron
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/2436
- Primary Topic
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00