Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych z dnia 1 lipca 2024 r. w sprawie Trump vs. Stany Zjednoczone, dotyczący immunitetu Prezydenta Stanów Zjednoczonych w postępowaniu karnym, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), in its decision of 1 July 2024, in the case of Trump v. United States, ruled that the President of the United States is immune from prosecution for an official act. The Court distinguished three categories of presidential acts: official acts within his/her exclusive sphere of constitutional authority, acts within the outer perimeter of his/her official responsibility as well as unofficial acts. Thus, immunity protection and its scope depend on the nature of the President’s actions. The SCOTUS also analysed the conduct alleged in the indictment, but it basically remanded to lower courts to determine in the first instance whether the alleged conduct was official or unofficial.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Sejmowy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2025.313
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych z dnia 1 lipca 2024 r. w sprawie Trump vs. Stany Zjednoczone, dotyczący immunitetu Prezydenta Stanów Zjednoczonych w postępowaniu karnym, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)

Maksymilian Grądz
Przegląd Sejmowy
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych z dnia 1 lipca 2024 r. w sprawie Trump vs. Stany Zjednoczone, dotyczący immunitetu Prezydenta Stanów Zjednoczonych w postępowaniu karnym, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)

Maksymilian Grądz
article en

Abstract

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), in its decision of 1 July 2024, in the case of Trump v. United States, ruled that the President of the United States is immune from prosecution for an official act. The Court distinguished three categories of presidential acts: official acts within his/her exclusive sphere of constitutional authority, acts within the outer perimeter of his/her official responsibility as well as unofficial acts. Thus, immunity protection and its scope depend on the nature of the President’s actions. The SCOTUS also analysed the conduct alleged in the indictment, but it basically remanded to lower courts to determine in the first instance whether the alleged conduct was official or unofficial.

Przegląd SejmowyVol. 3(188)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.