EVALUATING PATIENT-CLINICIAN COMMUNICATION IN ORAL SURGERY. A STUDY OF CALABAR, NIGERIA

ABSTRACT Background: Effective communication is vital in oral surgery for patient satisfaction, understanding, and treatment compliance. This study evaluated the impact of visual aids, digital consent forms, and motivational interviewing on patient outcomes in Calabar, Nigeria. Subjects and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over six months at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH) and General Hospital Calabar, involving 60 patients undergoing oral surgery. Participants were divided into four groups: (1) control (standard consultation), (2) visual aids, (3) digital consent form, and (4) motivational interviewing. Patient understanding was assessed using questionnaires before and after intervention, satisfaction was measured post-consultation, and compliance was tracked for two weeks post-surgery. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and t-tests. Results: The visual aids group showed a significant improvement in patient understanding (p < 0.05) and satisfaction (p < 0.05) compared to the control. The digital consent form group demonstrated higher recall of surgical information (p < 0.05) and better treatment compliance. Motivational interviewing significantly increased postoperative adherence and perceived support (p < 0.05). The combination of all three strategies yielded the highest levels of patient satisfaction and treatment compliance. Results: After 6 months, no significant differences were found between the two groups in sinus membrane elevation (P = 0.5267) or implant stability (P = 0.5573). Although bone height increased in both groups, the difference between them was not statistically significant (P = 0.1713). The Densah group showed a 50% lower risk of sinus membrane perforation compared to the Osteotome group, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.5483). Patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups at both 1 and 2 weeks (P > 0.05), while intragroup analysis showed a significant improvement in oral health impact profile in both groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Implementing visual aids, digital consent forms, and motivational interviewing techniques significantly enhances patient understanding, satisfaction, and compliance in oral surgery. These strategies should be integrated into routine clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006x-2025.21.7-139
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING PATIENT-CLINICIAN COMMUNICATION IN ORAL SURGERY. A STUDY OF CALABAR, NIGERIA

BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

EVALUATING PATIENT-CLINICIAN COMMUNICATION IN ORAL SURGERY. A STUDY OF CALABAR, NIGERIA

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Effective communication is vital in oral surgery for patient satisfaction, understanding, and treatment compliance. This study evaluated the impact of visual aids, digital consent forms, and motivational interviewing on patient outcomes in Calabar, Nigeria. Subjects and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over six months at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH) and General Hospital Calabar, involving 60 patients undergoing oral surgery. Participants were divided into four groups: (1) control (standard consultation), (2) visual aids, (3) digital consent form, and (4) motivational interviewing. Patient understanding was assessed using questionnaires before and after intervention, satisfaction was measured post-consultation, and compliance was tracked for two weeks post-surgery. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and t-tests. Results: The visual aids group showed a significant improvement in patient understanding (p < 0.05) and satisfaction (p < 0.05) compared to the control. The digital consent form group demonstrated higher recall of surgical information (p < 0.05) and better treatment compliance. Motivational interviewing significantly increased postoperative adherence and perceived support (p < 0.05). The combination of all three strategies yielded the highest levels of patient satisfaction and treatment compliance. Results: After 6 months, no significant differences were found between the two groups in sinus membrane elevation (P = 0.5267) or implant stability (P = 0.5573). Although bone height increased in both groups, the difference between them was not statistically significant (P = 0.1713). The Densah group showed a 50% lower risk of sinus membrane perforation compared to the Osteotome group, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.5483). Patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups at both 1 and 2 weeks (P > 0.05), while intragroup analysis showed a significant improvement in oral health impact profile in both groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Implementing visual aids, digital consent forms, and motivational interviewing techniques significantly enhances patient understanding, satisfaction, and compliance in oral surgery. These strategies should be integrated into routine clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Kampala International University (UG), University of Cross River State (NG), University of Calabar (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.