Music Training and Auditory-Visual Detection

Music training is a prominent model of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, with frequent claims that it improves general cognitive abilities and music- and speech-related perceptual abilities. There have been few attempts to assess whether music training confers benefits for general, basic perceptual processes. Here, we assessed whether music training improves response times (RTs) to auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli and, via the race model inequality (RMI), whether music training increases the magnitude of audiovisual integration. We compared the RTs of 27 musicians and 27 nonmusicians to unimodal and bimodal flash-tone stimuli, across four tasks that differed only in their response requirements. One task assessed simple RT, two assessed go/no-go performance (i.e., a simple RT task where one of the unimodal modalities had to be ignored), and the fourth task assessed the Colavita visual dominance effect via speeded modality discrimination. Musicians had faster RTs to all sensory modalities across the four tasks, but this difference was only statistically significant in the go/no-go tasks. There was no significant difference between musicians and nonmusicians in their susceptibility to the Colavita effect and the modality shift effect, or in the magnitude of their RMI violations (as assessed at both the group and observer levels). Our results suggest that long-term multisensory expertise (music training) does not affect basic cross-modal sensory interactions that influence RTs, but that musicians may have an advantage for intersensory selective attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2025.2464530
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Music Training and Auditory-Visual Detection

Philippe Lacherez, Naohide Yamamoto, Matthew O’Donohue
Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Music Training and Auditory-Visual Detection

Philippe Lacherez, Naohide Yamamoto, Matthew O’Donohue
article en

Abstract

Music training is a prominent model of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, with frequent claims that it improves general cognitive abilities and music- and speech-related perceptual abilities. There have been few attempts to assess whether music training confers benefits for general, basic perceptual processes. Here, we assessed whether music training improves response times (RTs) to auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli and, via the race model inequality (RMI), whether music training increases the magnitude of audiovisual integration. We compared the RTs of 27 musicians and 27 nonmusicians to unimodal and bimodal flash-tone stimuli, across four tasks that differed only in their response requirements. One task assessed simple RT, two assessed go/no-go performance (i.e., a simple RT task where one of the unimodal modalities had to be ignored), and the fourth task assessed the Colavita visual dominance effect via speeded modality discrimination. Musicians had faster RTs to all sensory modalities across the four tasks, but this difference was only statistically significant in the go/no-go tasks. There was no significant difference between musicians and nonmusicians in their susceptibility to the Colavita effect and the modality shift effect, or in the magnitude of their RMI violations (as assessed at both the group and observer levels). Our results suggest that long-term multisensory expertise (music training) does not affect basic cross-modal sensory interactions that influence RTs, but that musicians may have an advantage for intersensory selective attention.

Music Perception An Interdisciplinary JournalVol. 43(3)
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.