Examining The 24-Hour Activity Cycle At Work

The 24-hour activity cycle (24HAC) captures daily movement behavior included in specific domains of activity. Low levels of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) negatively impact health outcomes, such as body fat percentage (BF%), a biomarker contributing to myriad chronic diseases. However, evidence of the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and health is mixed, with some evidence suggesting an OPA paradox. And even less is known about differences between office (OWs) and non-office workers (NOWs) regarding OPA, LTP, and BF%. Isotemporal substitution (ISM) is a regression method estimating the “substitution effects” on a given health outcome by reallocating time spent in one behavior to another. Applying ISM to work-delineated 24HAC may elucidate the association between OPA and health. PUROSE: Examine effects of substituting OPA and LTPA for work sedentary time on BF% by OW status. METHODS: Participants (n = 424) were recruited from municipal government worksites. A quota-sampling framework was applied to obtain representation across labor sectors. Participants self-reported demographic and occupational data (office worker = ≥50% time in an office), wore an Actigraph GT3X+ for 14 days and had BF% measured with a bioelectric impedance analyzer. OPA and LTPA minutes were classified based on self-reported working hours. Unadjusted models assessed effects of substituting OPA for work sedentary time only while adjusted models included LTPA and leisure sedentary time. RESULTS: Replacing OPA with 30-minutes of LTPA was associated with a 0.84% decrease in BF% for OWs (B = -0.028, 95% CI: (-0.051, -.0047), p = 0.019) and a 1.08% decrease for NOWs (B = -0.036, 95% CI:(-0.067, -0.0047), p = 0.025). No significant associations were found for substituting OPA for work sedentary time. CONCLUSION: OPA and work sedentary time alone did not correlate with BF%. Replacing OPA with ~36-minutes of LTPA for OWs and ~ 28-minutes for NOWs resulted in a 1% decrease in BF. Given that many adults spend much of their time and accumulate 40% of their activity volume at work, researchers applying the 24HAC may need to consider occupation and assess the impact of OPA specifically on health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161336.00555.5a
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining The 24-Hour Activity Cycle At Work

Jennifer L. Gay, E. Grace Threadgill
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Examining The 24-Hour Activity Cycle At Work

Jennifer L. Gay, E. Grace Threadgill
article en

Abstract

The 24-hour activity cycle (24HAC) captures daily movement behavior included in specific domains of activity. Low levels of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) negatively impact health outcomes, such as body fat percentage (BF%), a biomarker contributing to myriad chronic diseases. However, evidence of the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and health is mixed, with some evidence suggesting an OPA paradox. And even less is known about differences between office (OWs) and non-office workers (NOWs) regarding OPA, LTP, and BF%. Isotemporal substitution (ISM) is a regression method estimating the “substitution effects” on a given health outcome by reallocating time spent in one behavior to another. Applying ISM to work-delineated 24HAC may elucidate the association between OPA and health. PUROSE: Examine effects of substituting OPA and LTPA for work sedentary time on BF% by OW status. METHODS: Participants (n = 424) were recruited from municipal government worksites. A quota-sampling framework was applied to obtain representation across labor sectors. Participants self-reported demographic and occupational data (office worker = ≥50% time in an office), wore an Actigraph GT3X+ for 14 days and had BF% measured with a bioelectric impedance analyzer. OPA and LTPA minutes were classified based on self-reported working hours. Unadjusted models assessed effects of substituting OPA for work sedentary time only while adjusted models included LTPA and leisure sedentary time. RESULTS: Replacing OPA with 30-minutes of LTPA was associated with a 0.84% decrease in BF% for OWs (B = -0.028, 95% CI: (-0.051, -.0047), p = 0.019) and a 1.08% decrease for NOWs (B = -0.036, 95% CI:(-0.067, -0.0047), p = 0.025). No significant associations were found for substituting OPA for work sedentary time. CONCLUSION: OPA and work sedentary time alone did not correlate with BF%. Replacing OPA with ~36-minutes of LTPA for OWs and ~ 28-minutes for NOWs resulted in a 1% decrease in BF. Given that many adults spend much of their time and accumulate 40% of their activity volume at work, researchers applying the 24HAC may need to consider occupation and assess the impact of OPA specifically on health outcomes.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.