Comparison Of Gait Parameters Between Curved, Non-motorized Treadmills Vs. Standard Motorized Treadmills At Various Speeds

PURPOSE:Treadmill use is widespread in clinical and fitness settings due to the many advantages afforded for rehabilitation and general exercise training. Types of treadmills include: the traditional motorized treadmill, the non-motorized treadmill, and the non-motorized curved treadmill. Walking and running on these different types of treadmills is believed to elicit different lower extremity kinematics and temporal-spatial gait adaptions responses, but these comparative data do not exist in one comprehensive investigation. Understanding the root causes of these biomechanical variables across different types of widely used treadmills can provide greater insight guiding their use in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to establish if differences exist in select lower extremity joint kinematics (hip flexion, hip abduction, hip rotation, pelvic obliquity, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion) and temporal gait variables (stance time, gait cadence), between walking and running on a curved, nonmotorized treadmill and a standard motorized treadmill. METHODS:Thirty-three apparently healthy, pain free subjects (age range 18-45) participated in this study. Select LE joint kinematics and temporal gait variables were measured using a 10-camera motion capture system. Participants performed one 1-minute trial at three, four, five, and six miles per hour on both a standard, motorized treadmill and curved, non-motorized treadmill with a 5-minute break between each. Data were analyzed using a factorial multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS:Significant increases in LE joint kinematics and temporal variables were observed between each speed (P < 0.05). With respect to treadmill type, differences were observed for increased ankle dorsiflexion, pelvic obliquity, and cadence. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that gait speed had a greater effect on the biomechanical variables measured compared to treadmill type. These data may assist clinicians in choosing treadmill type that best fits the circumstances of their patient with respect to gait training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161292.07428.60
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Gait Parameters Between Curved, Non-motorized Treadmills Vs. Standard Motorized Treadmills At Various Speeds

Arie J. van Duijn, Mitchell L. Cordova, Shawn D. Felton, H. Meyer et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Comparison Of Gait Parameters Between Curved, Non-motorized Treadmills Vs. Standard Motorized Treadmills At Various Speeds

Arie J. van Duijn, Mitchell L. Cordova, Shawn D. Felton, H. Meyer, Tyler Gregory
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE:Treadmill use is widespread in clinical and fitness settings due to the many advantages afforded for rehabilitation and general exercise training. Types of treadmills include: the traditional motorized treadmill, the non-motorized treadmill, and the non-motorized curved treadmill. Walking and running on these different types of treadmills is believed to elicit different lower extremity kinematics and temporal-spatial gait adaptions responses, but these comparative data do not exist in one comprehensive investigation. Understanding the root causes of these biomechanical variables across different types of widely used treadmills can provide greater insight guiding their use in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to establish if differences exist in select lower extremity joint kinematics (hip flexion, hip abduction, hip rotation, pelvic obliquity, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion) and temporal gait variables (stance time, gait cadence), between walking and running on a curved, nonmotorized treadmill and a standard motorized treadmill. METHODS:Thirty-three apparently healthy, pain free subjects (age range 18-45) participated in this study. Select LE joint kinematics and temporal gait variables were measured using a 10-camera motion capture system. Participants performed one 1-minute trial at three, four, five, and six miles per hour on both a standard, motorized treadmill and curved, non-motorized treadmill with a 5-minute break between each. Data were analyzed using a factorial multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS:Significant increases in LE joint kinematics and temporal variables were observed between each speed (P < 0.05). With respect to treadmill type, differences were observed for increased ankle dorsiflexion, pelvic obliquity, and cadence. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that gait speed had a greater effect on the biomechanical variables measured compared to treadmill type. These data may assist clinicians in choosing treadmill type that best fits the circumstances of their patient with respect to gait training.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Florida Gulf Coast University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.