Observation Of Gastrointestinal Symptoms During The Boston Marathon

Marathon running presents a unique exercise-related stress for myriad body systems. Previous literature suggests heat stress, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ingestion and course specifics (e.g. net grade) may contribute to gut permeability and gastrointestinal (GI) stress. The Boston Marathon involves a net downhill course, variable environmental conditions and a competitive field of qualified runners with faster finish times than other events. PURPOSE: Observe GI total symptom scores while competing in the 2024 Boston Marathon (20.4 ± 3.8 °C, 42 ± 12% relative humidity). METHODS: Seventy-seven healthy, qualified runners (38 females: 46 ± 12y, 1.67 ± .09 m, 60.54 ± 9.06 kg, 3.75 ± 0.54 hr finish time; 39 males: 53 ± 11y, 1.73 ± .09 m, 68.11 ± 9.68 kg; 3.66 ± 0.52 hr finish time) voluntarily reported to a research tent pre-race (within 1 hr of start) and post-race to complete GI symptom surveys. A total GI symptom score was quantified as a sum of symptom severity (rated 0-10) for each of 25 total symptoms. GI symptom scores were compared in a subset for those who reported NSAID ingestion during the race (n = 10). Repeated measures ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests were used to compare data with significance set as p < .05. RESULTS: Overall, GI symptom scores significantly increased from pre-race (10 ± 10) to post-race (28 ± 17; p < .001). Despite females reporting slightly greater symptom scores post-race (30 ± 17) compared to males (24 ± 15), there were no significant sex differences in GI symptom scores (p = .076). Interestingly, the most common symptoms pre-race were ‘urge to urinate’ (66%), ‘thirst’ (48%), and ‘loose stool’ (29%). Post-race, ‘muscle soreness’ (91%), ‘tired/fatigued’ (87%), and ‘thirst’ (77%) were most reported. Mean increase in GI symptom score was 18 ± 16 in non-NSAID users, while NSAID users reported an increase of 18 ± 13 (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: GI symptoms appear highly individualized and variable, which is consistent with previous literature. The marathon represents an overall stressful event for the GI system and symptoms seem inherent in this population. Future research should continue to investigate common triggers to symptom exacerbation and biomarker indications of symptom severity. This will help inform potentially effective GI symptom preventive measures for endurance runners. Supported by: This study was funded by the Boston Athletic Association Medical Research Grant Program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155292.49000.6c
Primary Topic
Travel-related health issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observation Of Gastrointestinal Symptoms During The Boston Marathon

Cory L. Butts, Whitley C. Atkins, Brendon P. McDermott, Zachary J. McKenna et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Travel-related health issues
article

Observation Of Gastrointestinal Symptoms During The Boston Marathon

Cory L. Butts, Whitley C. Atkins, Brendon P. McDermott, Zachary J. McKenna, Xiujing Zhao, Abigail K. Morris
article en

Abstract

Marathon running presents a unique exercise-related stress for myriad body systems. Previous literature suggests heat stress, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ingestion and course specifics (e.g. net grade) may contribute to gut permeability and gastrointestinal (GI) stress. The Boston Marathon involves a net downhill course, variable environmental conditions and a competitive field of qualified runners with faster finish times than other events. PURPOSE: Observe GI total symptom scores while competing in the 2024 Boston Marathon (20.4 ± 3.8 °C, 42 ± 12% relative humidity). METHODS: Seventy-seven healthy, qualified runners (38 females: 46 ± 12y, 1.67 ± .09 m, 60.54 ± 9.06 kg, 3.75 ± 0.54 hr finish time; 39 males: 53 ± 11y, 1.73 ± .09 m, 68.11 ± 9.68 kg; 3.66 ± 0.52 hr finish time) voluntarily reported to a research tent pre-race (within 1 hr of start) and post-race to complete GI symptom surveys. A total GI symptom score was quantified as a sum of symptom severity (rated 0-10) for each of 25 total symptoms. GI symptom scores were compared in a subset for those who reported NSAID ingestion during the race (n = 10). Repeated measures ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests were used to compare data with significance set as p < .05. RESULTS: Overall, GI symptom scores significantly increased from pre-race (10 ± 10) to post-race (28 ± 17; p < .001). Despite females reporting slightly greater symptom scores post-race (30 ± 17) compared to males (24 ± 15), there were no significant sex differences in GI symptom scores (p = .076). Interestingly, the most common symptoms pre-race were ‘urge to urinate’ (66%), ‘thirst’ (48%), and ‘loose stool’ (29%). Post-race, ‘muscle soreness’ (91%), ‘tired/fatigued’ (87%), and ‘thirst’ (77%) were most reported. Mean increase in GI symptom score was 18 ± 16 in non-NSAID users, while NSAID users reported an increase of 18 ± 13 (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: GI symptoms appear highly individualized and variable, which is consistent with previous literature. The marathon represents an overall stressful event for the GI system and symptoms seem inherent in this population. Future research should continue to investigate common triggers to symptom exacerbation and biomarker indications of symptom severity. This will help inform potentially effective GI symptom preventive measures for endurance runners. Supported by: This study was funded by the Boston Athletic Association Medical Research Grant Program.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of New Mexico (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Travel-related health issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.