Environmental Supports For Physical Activity During Pregnancy Across Levels Of Rurality

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that environmental supports for physical activity will be lower with greater rurality in pregnant individuals. METHODS: This secondary analysis from the Pregnancy 24/7 cohort study used data collected during each trimester of pregnancy from two study sites (Iowa City, IA and Morgantown, WV). LTPA was self-reported via the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) and scored as MET-hr per week. Environmental supports were measured via the self-reported Environmental Supports for Physical Activity Questionnaire, which provides a score where higher values indicate better environmental support for physical activity (range of 0-195). Based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, participants were classified as metropolitan urban (RUCA 1-3), micropolitan rural (RUCA 4-6), or small-town rural (RUCA 7-10). ANOVA compared leisure time activity durations and environmental physical activity support scores across rurality groups; post hoc tests determined pairwise differences. RESULTS: Among the 375 participants (mean age 30.2 ± 4.5 years), significant differences in LTPA across rurality groups were only significant in the second trimester (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences in environmental support scores were observed, with metropolitan urban groups reporting greater environmental support for physical activity compared to both micropolitan and small-town rural groups. See table for details. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant individuals in micropolitan rural and small-town rural areas report both lower LTPA levels in their second trimester and lower environmental supports and resources for physical activity. Increasing access and support for physical activity resources warrants further investigation as a strategy to promote activity among pregnant women in rural areas. - Table. LTPA and Environmental Supports for Physical Activity in Pregnant Individuals. Metro(N = 264) Micro(N = 42) Small Town(N = 69) Overall(N = 375) p-value LTPA (MET hrs/week) Trimester 1 13.4 (11.9) 10.7 (12.6) 9.94 (11.2) 12.5 (11.9) 0.061 Trimester 2 14.7 (13.2) 8.71 (9.81) 9.74 (12.5) 13.2 (13.0) 0.002 Trimester 3 11.8 (10.6) 11.0 (12.7) 9.60 (12.1) 11.3 (11.1) 0.395 Environmental Supports Score 53.7 (9.67) 47.4 (11.6) 47.7 (12.8) 51.9 (10.9) <0.001 Supported by: The Pregnancy 24/7 Cohort Study is supported by grant R01HL153095 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155464.80617.d8
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Supports For Physical Activity During Pregnancy Across Levels Of Rurality

Katrina Wilhite, Alexis Thrower, Kara M. Whitaker, Jean P. Marrero-Rivera et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Environmental Supports For Physical Activity During Pregnancy Across Levels Of Rurality

Katrina Wilhite, Alexis Thrower, Kara M. Whitaker, Jean P. Marrero-Rivera, Sharon E. Taverno Ross, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Jacob B. Gallagher, Carly Williamson, Elly Marshall
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that environmental supports for physical activity will be lower with greater rurality in pregnant individuals. METHODS: This secondary analysis from the Pregnancy 24/7 cohort study used data collected during each trimester of pregnancy from two study sites (Iowa City, IA and Morgantown, WV). LTPA was self-reported via the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) and scored as MET-hr per week. Environmental supports were measured via the self-reported Environmental Supports for Physical Activity Questionnaire, which provides a score where higher values indicate better environmental support for physical activity (range of 0-195). Based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, participants were classified as metropolitan urban (RUCA 1-3), micropolitan rural (RUCA 4-6), or small-town rural (RUCA 7-10). ANOVA compared leisure time activity durations and environmental physical activity support scores across rurality groups; post hoc tests determined pairwise differences. RESULTS: Among the 375 participants (mean age 30.2 ± 4.5 years), significant differences in LTPA across rurality groups were only significant in the second trimester (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences in environmental support scores were observed, with metropolitan urban groups reporting greater environmental support for physical activity compared to both micropolitan and small-town rural groups. See table for details. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant individuals in micropolitan rural and small-town rural areas report both lower LTPA levels in their second trimester and lower environmental supports and resources for physical activity. Increasing access and support for physical activity resources warrants further investigation as a strategy to promote activity among pregnant women in rural areas. - Table. LTPA and Environmental Supports for Physical Activity in Pregnant Individuals. Metro(N = 264) Micro(N = 42) Small Town(N = 69) Overall(N = 375) p-value LTPA (MET hrs/week) Trimester 1 13.4 (11.9) 10.7 (12.6) 9.94 (11.2) 12.5 (11.9) 0.061 Trimester 2 14.7 (13.2) 8.71 (9.81) 9.74 (12.5) 13.2 (13.0) 0.002 Trimester 3 11.8 (10.6) 11.0 (12.7) 9.60 (12.1) 11.3 (11.1) 0.395 Environmental Supports Score 53.7 (9.67) 47.4 (11.6) 47.7 (12.8) 51.9 (10.9) <0.001 Supported by: The Pregnancy 24/7 Cohort Study is supported by grant R01HL153095 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
West Virginia University (US), University of Iowa (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.