Various Ischemic Preconditioning Pressures Do Not Impact Pain Pressure Threshold Or Tolerance Responses

PURPOSE: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) at high occlusion pressures has been reported to induce a hypoalgesic effect via the release of endogenous opioids. It has not been determined if moderate pressures also exhibit a positive effect. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute effects of IPC at low, moderate, and high pressures on pain pressure threshold (PPTThreshold) and pain pressure tolerance (PPTTolerance). METHODS: Thirteen recreationally active (21.5 ± 2.5 years; 169.4 ± 9.4 cm; 69.6 ± 12.9 kg) females (n = 6) and males (n = 7) visited the laboratory on three separate visits. In a randomized order, participants completed three cycles of IPC at low (SHAM [20 mmHg]), moderate (80% of total arterial occlusion pressure), and high (220 mmHg) pressures. IPC was applied with a pneumatic cuff on the most proximal aspect of dominant limb. Each IPC cycle consisted of five minutes of pressure followed by five minutes of rest. Prior to and immediately following IPC, PPTThreshold and PPTTolerance were assessed from the rectus femoris muscle. Separate 3 (Pressure [low, moderate, and high) x 2 (Time [pretest, posttest]) repeated measures ANOVA were performed to assess any mean differences. RESULTS: There was no significant (p = 0.418) interaction or main effect for Pressure (p = 0.279) or Time (p = 0.389) for PPTThreshold. For PPTTolerance, there was no significant (p = 0.360) interaction or main effect for Pressure (p = 0.713) or Time (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of pain were not affected by IPC regardless of pressure applied. These findings suggest that three cycles of IPC were not sufficient to induce a hypoalgesic effect. Additional IPC cycles or longer durations may be required to alter perceptions of pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157664.39294.0e
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Various Ischemic Preconditioning Pressures Do Not Impact Pain Pressure Threshold Or Tolerance Responses

Niriham M. Shah, Sean M. Lubiak, Ethan C. Hill, Mason A. Howard et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
article

Various Ischemic Preconditioning Pressures Do Not Impact Pain Pressure Threshold Or Tolerance Responses

Niriham M. Shah, Sean M. Lubiak, Ethan C. Hill, Mason A. Howard, Anuj J. Prajapati, Nihar N. Patel, Emma K. Herring
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) at high occlusion pressures has been reported to induce a hypoalgesic effect via the release of endogenous opioids. It has not been determined if moderate pressures also exhibit a positive effect. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute effects of IPC at low, moderate, and high pressures on pain pressure threshold (PPTThreshold) and pain pressure tolerance (PPTTolerance). METHODS: Thirteen recreationally active (21.5 ± 2.5 years; 169.4 ± 9.4 cm; 69.6 ± 12.9 kg) females (n = 6) and males (n = 7) visited the laboratory on three separate visits. In a randomized order, participants completed three cycles of IPC at low (SHAM [20 mmHg]), moderate (80% of total arterial occlusion pressure), and high (220 mmHg) pressures. IPC was applied with a pneumatic cuff on the most proximal aspect of dominant limb. Each IPC cycle consisted of five minutes of pressure followed by five minutes of rest. Prior to and immediately following IPC, PPTThreshold and PPTTolerance were assessed from the rectus femoris muscle. Separate 3 (Pressure [low, moderate, and high) x 2 (Time [pretest, posttest]) repeated measures ANOVA were performed to assess any mean differences. RESULTS: There was no significant (p = 0.418) interaction or main effect for Pressure (p = 0.279) or Time (p = 0.389) for PPTThreshold. For PPTTolerance, there was no significant (p = 0.360) interaction or main effect for Pressure (p = 0.713) or Time (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of pain were not affected by IPC regardless of pressure applied. These findings suggest that three cycles of IPC were not sufficient to induce a hypoalgesic effect. Additional IPC cycles or longer durations may be required to alter perceptions of pain.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Central Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.