Comparative Performance Analysis of CSV and JSON Formats in Data Processing System

The efficiency and performance of data processing in modern data-intensive systems are greatly impacted by the data format selection. Comma-Separated Values (CSV) and JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) are two widely used formats that possess distinct processing and structural characteristics. This research does a comparative performance analysis of CSV and JSON in data processing systems by evaluating execution time, memory usage, and CPU consumption. Controlled experiments were conducted on categorized datasets as small (1MB), medium (1–3MB), and large (up to 5MB) via a Python application. The results demonstrated that for small datasets, JSON surpassed CSV in execution time (0.014s compared to 0.019s), consumed slightly more memory (174.25MB against 172.92MB), and used less CPU (0.06% versus 0.07%). In medium datasets, JSON exhibited enhanced execution performance relative to CSV (0.041s against 0.044s), with little disparities in memory usage (263.28MB compared to 260.53MB) and CPU utilization (both at 0.09%). For large datasets, JSON exhibited superior execution time (0.065s versus 0.076s) and somewhat improved memory efficiency (332.57MB relative to 334.71MB), while CPU utilization remained stable. This research demonstrates that JSON consistently shows superior speed performance, especially as dataset size increases; yet, both forms remain viable depending on system constraints and data complexity. This research offers practical recommendations for developers and system architects in selecting the most suitable format for various data processing needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icoailo66760.2025.11156005
Primary Topic
Advanced Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of CSV and JSON Formats in Data Processing System

Sonya Rapinta Manalu, Hafizh Ash Shiddiqi, Agief Prakasa Nurdien, Jennadam Purba
Advanced Algorithms and Applications
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of CSV and JSON Formats in Data Processing System

Sonya Rapinta Manalu, Hafizh Ash Shiddiqi, Agief Prakasa Nurdien, Jennadam Purba
article en

Abstract

The efficiency and performance of data processing in modern data-intensive systems are greatly impacted by the data format selection. Comma-Separated Values (CSV) and JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) are two widely used formats that possess distinct processing and structural characteristics. This research does a comparative performance analysis of CSV and JSON in data processing systems by evaluating execution time, memory usage, and CPU consumption. Controlled experiments were conducted on categorized datasets as small (1MB), medium (1–3MB), and large (up to 5MB) via a Python application. The results demonstrated that for small datasets, JSON surpassed CSV in execution time (0.014s compared to 0.019s), consumed slightly more memory (174.25MB against 172.92MB), and used less CPU (0.06% versus 0.07%). In medium datasets, JSON exhibited enhanced execution performance relative to CSV (0.041s against 0.044s), with little disparities in memory usage (263.28MB compared to 260.53MB) and CPU utilization (both at 0.09%). For large datasets, JSON exhibited superior execution time (0.065s versus 0.076s) and somewhat improved memory efficiency (332.57MB relative to 334.71MB), while CPU utilization remained stable. This research demonstrates that JSON consistently shows superior speed performance, especially as dataset size increases; yet, both forms remain viable depending on system constraints and data complexity. This research offers practical recommendations for developers and system architects in selecting the most suitable format for various data processing needs.

Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advanced Algorithms and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.