LLM Assisted Attribute Generation for Image Datasets – A ChatGPT Case Study.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced tremendously in recent years. Large-scale models such as GPT4, GEMINI, Llama, and Claude have opened new frontiers for what is possible for generative models. They’ve been utilized in a plethora of applications, including those that require tedious domain knowledge and subject matter expertise. One such application for the utilization of LLMs proposed in this study is the attribute generation process for both labeled and unlabeled datasets. Data labels, along with the image features/attributes, are crucial for the application of image datasets in causal reasoning tasks. Causal reasoning for image datasets cannot be accomplished without the proper data labels, which serve as the ground truth. However, manual data labeling and attribute/feature generation for image datasets is a tedious and sometimes unfeasible task. Therefore, we propose to use LLMs for automating the attribute generation and image labeling task for images. To address this, we investigate LLMs to determine whether they are capable of generating attributes and how correct these attributes are. Using two different datasets and a combination of prompt-tuning, we highlight mixed results for the ability of ChatGPT 4o to accurately classify the image label and generate attributes for the images based on the prompt, types of images, input methods, and whether fine-tuning is performed. For the AWA dataset, we highlight $100 \%$ accuracy for image classification and attribute generation when prompted with the options for the possible attributes. When the attribute options are not provided the results vary for both datasets. For the MRI scans, the accuracy of the image classification and attributes varied from $40 \%$ to $100 \%$ depending on whether the attribute options were provided and the level of granularity needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sera65747.2025.11154605
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM Assisted Attribute Generation for Image Datasets – A ChatGPT Case Study.

Atul Rawal, Qianlong Wang, Adrienne Raglin, Ziying Tang
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

LLM Assisted Attribute Generation for Image Datasets – A ChatGPT Case Study.

Atul Rawal, Qianlong Wang, Adrienne Raglin, Ziying Tang
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced tremendously in recent years. Large-scale models such as GPT4, GEMINI, Llama, and Claude have opened new frontiers for what is possible for generative models. They’ve been utilized in a plethora of applications, including those that require tedious domain knowledge and subject matter expertise. One such application for the utilization of LLMs proposed in this study is the attribute generation process for both labeled and unlabeled datasets. Data labels, along with the image features/attributes, are crucial for the application of image datasets in causal reasoning tasks. Causal reasoning for image datasets cannot be accomplished without the proper data labels, which serve as the ground truth. However, manual data labeling and attribute/feature generation for image datasets is a tedious and sometimes unfeasible task. Therefore, we propose to use LLMs for automating the attribute generation and image labeling task for images. To address this, we investigate LLMs to determine whether they are capable of generating attributes and how correct these attributes are. Using two different datasets and a combination of prompt-tuning, we highlight mixed results for the ability of ChatGPT 4o to accurately classify the image label and generate attributes for the images based on the prompt, types of images, input methods, and whether fine-tuning is performed. For the AWA dataset, we highlight $100 \%$ accuracy for image classification and attribute generation when prompted with the options for the possible attributes. When the attribute options are not provided the results vary for both datasets. For the MRI scans, the accuracy of the image classification and attributes varied from $40 \%$ to $100 \%$ depending on whether the attribute options were provided and the level of granularity needed.

DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US), Towson University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.