Can Large Language Models Understand Chinese Neologisms?

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have achieved groundbreaking progress in natural language processing, demonstrating remarkable generalization capabilities in text comprehension, content generation, and semantic reasoning. However, language itself constantly evolves with frequent emergence of neologisms, making models' ability to accurately understand their meanings and make contextually appropriate inferences a crucial indicator of their generalization capacity. To investigate LLMs' comprehension of Chinese neologisms, this study constructs an evaluation framework specifically designed to assess models' understanding and application capabilities regarding Chinese neologisms. We curated a dataset containing 2,644 evaluation items from 645 neologisms selected from the Annual Media Neologism Lists (2021–2023) in China's Language Life Reports. The evaluation results reveal substantial room for improvement in large language models' comprehension and application of Chinese neologisms compared to their performance with common words. The DeepSeek model, predominantly trained on Chinese corpora, demonstrates significant advantages in processing Chinese neologisms, while ChatGPT -40 exhibits stronger adaptive learning capabilities. Although DeepSeek and ChatGPT -40 show varying performance across different neologism categories, their accuracy distributions follow similar patterns. Notably, both models' accuracy in understanding neologisms does not show a year-by-year decline but rather displays a performance trough in 2022. This phenomenon stems from the uneven distribution of neologism types across years - the higher proportion of abbreviated neologisms in 2022 (compared to other years) particularly constrained models' comprehension. The analysis indicates that semantic neologisms and abbreviated neologisms represent the most challenging categories, suggesting critical improvement opportunities for large language models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ialp68296.2024.11156705
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Large Language Models Understand Chinese Neologisms?

Shan Yu, Ye Zou
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Can Large Language Models Understand Chinese Neologisms?

Shan Yu, Ye Zou
article en

Abstract

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have achieved groundbreaking progress in natural language processing, demonstrating remarkable generalization capabilities in text comprehension, content generation, and semantic reasoning. However, language itself constantly evolves with frequent emergence of neologisms, making models' ability to accurately understand their meanings and make contextually appropriate inferences a crucial indicator of their generalization capacity. To investigate LLMs' comprehension of Chinese neologisms, this study constructs an evaluation framework specifically designed to assess models' understanding and application capabilities regarding Chinese neologisms. We curated a dataset containing 2,644 evaluation items from 645 neologisms selected from the Annual Media Neologism Lists (2021–2023) in China's Language Life Reports. The evaluation results reveal substantial room for improvement in large language models' comprehension and application of Chinese neologisms compared to their performance with common words. The DeepSeek model, predominantly trained on Chinese corpora, demonstrates significant advantages in processing Chinese neologisms, while ChatGPT -40 exhibits stronger adaptive learning capabilities. Although DeepSeek and ChatGPT -40 show varying performance across different neologism categories, their accuracy distributions follow similar patterns. Notably, both models' accuracy in understanding neologisms does not show a year-by-year decline but rather displays a performance trough in 2022. This phenomenon stems from the uneven distribution of neologism types across years - the higher proportion of abbreviated neologisms in 2022 (compared to other years) particularly constrained models' comprehension. The analysis indicates that semantic neologisms and abbreviated neologisms represent the most challenging categories, suggesting critical improvement opportunities for large language models.

Jinan University (CN), Guangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.