A Comparative Study of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 Models for Deepfake Detection

With the increasing production of hyper-realistic altered images, the need for effective deepfake detection technology has become critical. These altered images pose significant threats to security, privacy, and the spread of misinformation, complicating the distinction between authentic and manipulated content. This challenge has far-reaching implications, from social media and politics to personal relationships. This study focuses on detecting deepfake human face images using a balanced dataset of 140,000 images, comprising 70,000 real faces sourced from Nvidia’s Flickr dataset and 70,000 fake faces generated by StyleGAN. In this research, we compare the performance of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 models, to identify subtle manipulations in high-quality deepfake images. Our findings demonstrate that the EfficientNetB4 model achieves an accuracy of 98.54%, while the VGG19 model reaches 99.11% in the base model, highlighting the effectiveness of these models in advancing deepfake detection technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/amlds63918.2025.11159417
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 Models for Deepfake Detection

Naseef Mansoor, Sandesh Shrestha, Eun Soo Park, Surendra Singh Gautam
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

A Comparative Study of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 Models for Deepfake Detection

Naseef Mansoor, Sandesh Shrestha, Eun Soo Park, Surendra Singh Gautam
article en

Abstract

With the increasing production of hyper-realistic altered images, the need for effective deepfake detection technology has become critical. These altered images pose significant threats to security, privacy, and the spread of misinformation, complicating the distinction between authentic and manipulated content. This challenge has far-reaching implications, from social media and politics to personal relationships. This study focuses on detecting deepfake human face images using a balanced dataset of 140,000 images, comprising 70,000 real faces sourced from Nvidia’s Flickr dataset and 70,000 fake faces generated by StyleGAN. In this research, we compare the performance of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 models, to identify subtle manipulations in high-quality deepfake images. Our findings demonstrate that the EfficientNetB4 model achieves an accuracy of 98.54%, while the VGG19 model reaches 99.11% in the base model, highlighting the effectiveness of these models in advancing deepfake detection technology.

Minnesota State University, Mankato (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of EfficientNetB4 and VGG19 Models for Deepfake Detection — Naseef Mansoor, Sandesh Shrestha, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS