A decision flow for mapping AI agents to the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

In this paper, I propose a decision-flow approach to systematically align artificial intelligence (AI) agent architectures with the six functions of the NIST Cyber Security Framework (CSF) 2.0. By categorising agents into reactive, deliberative, hybrid, and learning types, the framework guides organisations in selecting the most suitable AI agent based on specific cybersecurity threat profiles, operational requirements, and NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories. Through a layered decision model, security practitioners can quickly determine whether near real-time responsiveness, strategic planning, adaptive learning, or a combination of these capabilities is paramount. Preliminary examples demonstrate how the decision flow aids in effective deployment, from initial risk assessment to ongoing governance. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating this agent-based strategy into existing Security Operations Centres (SOCs) and suggestions for future empirical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/amlds63918.2025.11159406
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A decision flow for mapping AI agents to the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

Masike Malatji
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
article

A decision flow for mapping AI agents to the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

Masike Malatji
article en

Abstract

In this paper, I propose a decision-flow approach to systematically align artificial intelligence (AI) agent architectures with the six functions of the NIST Cyber Security Framework (CSF) 2.0. By categorising agents into reactive, deliberative, hybrid, and learning types, the framework guides organisations in selecting the most suitable AI agent based on specific cybersecurity threat profiles, operational requirements, and NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories. Through a layered decision model, security practitioners can quickly determine whether near real-time responsiveness, strategic planning, adaptive learning, or a combination of these capabilities is paramount. Preliminary examples demonstrate how the decision flow aids in effective deployment, from initial risk assessment to ongoing governance. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating this agent-based strategy into existing Security Operations Centres (SOCs) and suggestions for future empirical validation.

University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A decision flow for mapping AI agents to the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0 — Masike Malatji · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS