Towards Understanding Fairness Adequacy Testing in Financial Machine Learning Systems

Machine learning (ML) systems in finance raise concerns about fairness, bias, and regulatory compliance, especially in high-stakes areas like creditworthiness, lending, and risk assessment. Bias in ML can lead to systemic economic exclusion, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. This paper explores fairness adequacy testing in financial ML models, addressing regulatory, technical, and ethical challenges while proposing bias mitigation strategies. Financial ML models face unique constraints, including strict privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) in the U.S., and Basel Committee fairness standards, along with reliance on proprietary data. While this work provides an overview of fairness challenges, the detailed scoping review will be conducted in a subsequent study to further analyze regulatory frameworks and industry practices. This paper aims to highlight key gaps and considerations that must be addressed to balance fairness and accuracy in ML-driven financial decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sera65747.2025.11154631
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Understanding Fairness Adequacy Testing in Financial Machine Learning Systems

Jubril Gbolahan Adigun, Madhusudan Srinivasan, Kehinde Akinola
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Towards Understanding Fairness Adequacy Testing in Financial Machine Learning Systems

Jubril Gbolahan Adigun, Madhusudan Srinivasan, Kehinde Akinola
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) systems in finance raise concerns about fairness, bias, and regulatory compliance, especially in high-stakes areas like creditworthiness, lending, and risk assessment. Bias in ML can lead to systemic economic exclusion, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. This paper explores fairness adequacy testing in financial ML models, addressing regulatory, technical, and ethical challenges while proposing bias mitigation strategies. Financial ML models face unique constraints, including strict privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) in the U.S., and Basel Committee fairness standards, along with reliance on proprietary data. While this work provides an overview of fairness challenges, the detailed scoping review will be conducted in a subsequent study to further analyze regulatory frameworks and industry practices. This paper aims to highlight key gaps and considerations that must be addressed to balance fairness and accuracy in ML-driven financial decision-making.

East Carolina University (US), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards Understanding Fairness Adequacy Testing in Financial Machine Learning Systems — Jubril Gbolahan Adigun, Madhusudan Srinivasan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS