Acoustically Transparent Sample Containers for Quantitative Cavitation Imaging

Passive acoustic mapping (PAM) is a powerful and widely used method of imaging cavitation activity. However, the presence of a container around a cavitating sample in experiments performed in vitro can introduce significant aberrations into recorded cavitation noise and resulting PAM images. These artifacts may lead to energy being incorrectly estimated or mapped to the wrong place, preventing accurate correlation between cavitation and bioeffects. In this work, we quantify these acoustic effects for six common types of sample containers using an acoustic reciprocity experiment, then use the results to inform the design of a new container with improved acoustic transparency. Existing vessels were found to introduce up to 13-dB broadband insertion loss and change the location and spread of energy in PAM images by up to 1 mm and 25%, respectively. The new container caused up to 1.4-dB insertion loss (the lowest of any container tested) and introduced no significant phase aberration, source location error, or change in energy spread to the PAM images. Testing the new container with real cavitation noise produced very similar insertion loss figures of up to 1.6 dB. These results highlight deficiencies in existing sample containers for the purposes of quantifying cavitation activity with PAM, which is increasingly desired as cavitation matures as a therapy. The guidelines for acoustic transparency developed here may assist researchers in avoiding container aberrations and enable accurate measurement of cavitation energy in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2025.3609832
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acoustically Transparent Sample Containers for Quantitative Cavitation Imaging

Michael Gray, Constantin Coussios, A. R. Collins, Darcy M. Dunn-Lawless
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
Underwater Acoustics Research
article

Acoustically Transparent Sample Containers for Quantitative Cavitation Imaging

Michael Gray, Constantin Coussios, A. R. Collins, Darcy M. Dunn-Lawless
article en

Abstract

Passive acoustic mapping (PAM) is a powerful and widely used method of imaging cavitation activity. However, the presence of a container around a cavitating sample in experiments performed in vitro can introduce significant aberrations into recorded cavitation noise and resulting PAM images. These artifacts may lead to energy being incorrectly estimated or mapped to the wrong place, preventing accurate correlation between cavitation and bioeffects. In this work, we quantify these acoustic effects for six common types of sample containers using an acoustic reciprocity experiment, then use the results to inform the design of a new container with improved acoustic transparency. Existing vessels were found to introduce up to 13-dB broadband insertion loss and change the location and spread of energy in PAM images by up to 1 mm and 25%, respectively. The new container caused up to 1.4-dB insertion loss (the lowest of any container tested) and introduced no significant phase aberration, source location error, or change in energy spread to the PAM images. Testing the new container with real cavitation noise produced very similar insertion loss figures of up to 1.6 dB. These results highlight deficiencies in existing sample containers for the purposes of quantifying cavitation activity with PAM, which is increasingly desired as cavitation matures as a therapy. The guidelines for acoustic transparency developed here may assist researchers in avoiding container aberrations and enable accurate measurement of cavitation energy in future studies.

IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlVol. 72(11)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Underwater Acoustics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.