Innovative Longevity Design through Boundary Object Integration

This descriptive study explores how Longevity Planning Blocks (LPBs) can serve as boundary objects to facilitate conversations and identify user needs in service design, thereby advancing the understanding of Design for Longevity (D4L) within financial planning, service innovation, and system design. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analyzed 69 one-hour in-person D4L service experiments with participants in Boston, USA, categorized by age: adulthood (25-54), pre-retirement (55-64), and post-retirement (65-84), with controls for gender balance, annual household income, savings, and investable assets. We identified six key considerations to improve the design of LPBs—adaptability, tangibility, modularity, learnability, unpredictability, and scalability—based on six emerging themes as core codes and 11 codes, which include understanding individuals’ needs, fostering point-to-talk behavior, presenting dynamic life stages dependent on individual preferences, incorporating unique lived experiences, prioritizing preparation over planning, and positioning a longevity coach as a continuous touchpoint for financial wellbeing, acting as a financial therapist. These insights highlight the value and challenges of using tangible artifacts as boundary objects to enhance D4L design and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Base Diseño e Innovación
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52611/bdi.num11.2024.1197
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Longevity Design through Boundary Object Integration

Joseph F. Coughlin, Alexa Balmuth, Maria C. Yang, Sheng-Hung Lee
Base Diseño e Innovación
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Innovative Longevity Design through Boundary Object Integration

Joseph F. Coughlin, Alexa Balmuth, Maria C. Yang, Sheng-Hung Lee
article en

Abstract

This descriptive study explores how Longevity Planning Blocks (LPBs) can serve as boundary objects to facilitate conversations and identify user needs in service design, thereby advancing the understanding of Design for Longevity (D4L) within financial planning, service innovation, and system design. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analyzed 69 one-hour in-person D4L service experiments with participants in Boston, USA, categorized by age: adulthood (25-54), pre-retirement (55-64), and post-retirement (65-84), with controls for gender balance, annual household income, savings, and investable assets. We identified six key considerations to improve the design of LPBs—adaptability, tangibility, modularity, learnability, unpredictability, and scalability—based on six emerging themes as core codes and 11 codes, which include understanding individuals’ needs, fostering point-to-talk behavior, presenting dynamic life stages dependent on individual preferences, incorporating unique lived experiences, prioritizing preparation over planning, and positioning a longevity coach as a continuous touchpoint for financial wellbeing, acting as a financial therapist. These insights highlight the value and challenges of using tangible artifacts as boundary objects to enhance D4L design and development.

Base Diseño e InnovaciónVol. 9(11)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Innovative Longevity Design through Boundary Object Integration — Joseph F. Coughlin, Alexa Balmuth, et al. · Base Diseño e Innovación (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS