Brazilian concentration camps for drought refugees 1915/1932

At the turn of the twentieth century, Northeast Brazil suffered some of the most severe droughts ever recorded, popularly known as the Terrible Years. Displaced families from the inlands were forced to seek refuge by relocating to the coastal and capital cities of the region. These drought refugees were called flagelados (flagellated in Portuguese), a demeaning term used strategically to reinforce their status as poor and landless individuals. In response to this crisis, local and national governments constructed temporary concentration camps in 1915 and again in 1932, which mobilized and sheltered more than 150,000 people. These camps operated not only as sites of aid but also as mechanisms for organizing and controlling labor power. This strategy was officially established by the Brazilian government to manage refugee populations in need, while simultaneously advancing ideals of modernization, progress, and national development. Once the droughts ended, the camps were dismantled, but the long-lasting effects of these physical and social structures remain present in the everyday lives of the Nordestinos , the people from Northeast Brazil. This paper argues that urban modernization in Northeast Brazil is deeply entangled with the legacy of these drought concentration camps and the resettlement of rural flagelados . The camps reflect histories of care, control, and exploitation that connect directly to ongoing injustices today. Drawing on archival material, medical surveys, and reports from the Brazilian national agency combating droughts (DNOCS), and engaging with the emerging theoretical framework of “camp studies,” this paper sheds new light on a core episode of Brazilian history. Within this framework, it examines the role of the built environment in shaping social and political order, while contributing to broader discussions on the construction and consequences of environments for climate refugees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251376194
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian concentration camps for drought refugees 1915/1932

Laura Belik
1 citations
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
article

Brazilian concentration camps for drought refugees 1915/1932

Laura Belik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At the turn of the twentieth century, Northeast Brazil suffered some of the most severe droughts ever recorded, popularly known as the Terrible Years. Displaced families from the inlands were forced to seek refuge by relocating to the coastal and capital cities of the region. These drought refugees were called flagelados (flagellated in Portuguese), a demeaning term used strategically to reinforce their status as poor and landless individuals. In response to this crisis, local and national governments constructed temporary concentration camps in 1915 and again in 1932, which mobilized and sheltered more than 150,000 people. These camps operated not only as sites of aid but also as mechanisms for organizing and controlling labor power. This strategy was officially established by the Brazilian government to manage refugee populations in need, while simultaneously advancing ideals of modernization, progress, and national development. Once the droughts ended, the camps were dismantled, but the long-lasting effects of these physical and social structures remain present in the everyday lives of the Nordestinos , the people from Northeast Brazil. This paper argues that urban modernization in Northeast Brazil is deeply entangled with the legacy of these drought concentration camps and the resettlement of rural flagelados . The camps reflect histories of care, control, and exploitation that connect directly to ongoing injustices today. Drawing on archival material, medical surveys, and reports from the Brazilian national agency combating droughts (DNOCS), and engaging with the emerging theoretical framework of “camp studies,” this paper sheds new light on a core episode of Brazilian history. Within this framework, it examines the role of the built environment in shaping social and political order, while contributing to broader discussions on the construction and consequences of environments for climate refugees.

Environment and Planning E Nature and SpaceVol. 9(1)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.