Hope and dispossession: Strange bedfellows in Indigenous-state relations

This article investigates the dynamics between hope and dispossession in the relations between Indigenous peoples and states. These relations, historically marked by colonial interventions, boast hopeful developments ranging from the recognition of rights to truth and reconciliation processes. Drawing on critical hope scholarship and research on contemporary colonialism, this article delves into the question of reconciliation and the (allegedly) reorganised Indigenous-state relations. Engaging with the state continues to be, in many ways, problematic for Indigenous peoples whose hopes often clash with those of the state. Even though experiences from completed truth and reconciliation processes around the world have been fraught with foundational shortcomings, the shortcomings have not discouraged Indigenous peoples from initiating and taking part in reconciliation. Embracing this global trend, three Nordic countries – Finland, Sweden and Norway – have each embarked upon a truth and reconciliation process with the Sámi people. Utilising the recent Nordic processes as reference points, this article reveals how states employ hope to govern their relations with the peoples, an aspect that has been neglected to date. In particular, it highlights how the element of time (integral to hope) and the clash of parties’ disparate hopes are key to understanding power asymmetries in these relations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cooperation and Conflict
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367251372837
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hope and dispossession: Strange bedfellows in Indigenous-state relations

Marjo Lindroth, Heidi Sinevaara-Niskanen
Cooperation and Conflict
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Hope and dispossession: Strange bedfellows in Indigenous-state relations

Marjo Lindroth, Heidi Sinevaara-Niskanen
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the dynamics between hope and dispossession in the relations between Indigenous peoples and states. These relations, historically marked by colonial interventions, boast hopeful developments ranging from the recognition of rights to truth and reconciliation processes. Drawing on critical hope scholarship and research on contemporary colonialism, this article delves into the question of reconciliation and the (allegedly) reorganised Indigenous-state relations. Engaging with the state continues to be, in many ways, problematic for Indigenous peoples whose hopes often clash with those of the state. Even though experiences from completed truth and reconciliation processes around the world have been fraught with foundational shortcomings, the shortcomings have not discouraged Indigenous peoples from initiating and taking part in reconciliation. Embracing this global trend, three Nordic countries – Finland, Sweden and Norway – have each embarked upon a truth and reconciliation process with the Sámi people. Utilising the recent Nordic processes as reference points, this article reveals how states employ hope to govern their relations with the peoples, an aspect that has been neglected to date. In particular, it highlights how the element of time (integral to hope) and the clash of parties’ disparate hopes are key to understanding power asymmetries in these relations.

Cooperation and Conflict
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.