Gender Differences In Anaerobic And Aerobic Responses To A Full Season Of Ice Hockey

It has been well-established that success in elite ice hockey requires high levels of both aerobic and anaerobic fitness. To date, research is somewhat sparse as well as contradictory in its findings when examining the impact of a season of ice hockey on both anaerobic and aerobic fitness. Additionally, on the whole, women are underrepresented in athlete research and there is a lack of data comparing male and female athletes in any sport, especially those who compete at the elite level. Furthermore, there is very little evidence examining differences between genders regarding anaerobic and aerobic adaptations to a full season of ice hockey competition. PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the differences in aerobic and anaerobic capacity between male and female collegiate hockey players and the impact of a full season of competition on those differences. METHODS: Prior to the start of the season 57 NCAA Division 1 hockey players (28 men, 28 women) completed a VO2 max test and a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT). Included participants then completed the same tests after the ending of the season (15 men; Age = 22.1 ± 1.28 yrs; Ht = 1.85 ± 0.87 m; Wt = 88.55 ± 9.12 kg/14 women; Age = 20.16 ± 1.28 yrs; Ht = 1.67 ± 0.06; Wt = 66.02 ± 6.98 kg). RESULTS: Relative mean power (RMP; W/kg), relative peak power (RPP; W/kg), and fatigue index (FI;%) were used as WAnT performance variables. Preseason VO2 max (Men = 55.16 ± 4.18 ml/kg/min; Women = 45.40 ± 5.08 ml/kg/min) was not significantly different from postseason VO2 (Men = 52.65 ± 4.25 ml/kg/min; Women = 46.47 ± 5.88 ml/kg/min) in either gender. Men did have a significantly higher VO2 max at both time points (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in RPP (Men Pre/Post = 15.27 ± 5.26/12.98 ± 3.78 W/kg; Women Pre/Post = 12.97 ± 10.25/16.40 ± 11.27 W/kg), RMP (Men Pre/Post = 8.76 ± 0.95/8.21 ± 0.83; Women Pre/Post = 6.75 ± 1.09/7.10 ± 0.91) or FI (Men Pre/Post = 66.16 ± 22.72/68.06 ± 22.93 %; Women Pre/Post = 56.63 ± 26.58/60.73 ± 6.57 %) between pre and post season for either gender. Men demonstrated a significantly higher RMP than women (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed between genders regarding RPP (0.791) or FI (p = 0.250). CONCLUSION: A season of ice hockey is not an appropriate stimulus to increase VO2 or Wingate variables in men or women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157284.61486.35
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences In Anaerobic And Aerobic Responses To A Full Season Of Ice Hockey

Paul F. Mellick, Brett D. Bruininks, Derek Marrier, Nicole Vallario
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Gender Differences In Anaerobic And Aerobic Responses To A Full Season Of Ice Hockey

Paul F. Mellick, Brett D. Bruininks, Derek Marrier, Nicole Vallario
article en

Abstract

It has been well-established that success in elite ice hockey requires high levels of both aerobic and anaerobic fitness. To date, research is somewhat sparse as well as contradictory in its findings when examining the impact of a season of ice hockey on both anaerobic and aerobic fitness. Additionally, on the whole, women are underrepresented in athlete research and there is a lack of data comparing male and female athletes in any sport, especially those who compete at the elite level. Furthermore, there is very little evidence examining differences between genders regarding anaerobic and aerobic adaptations to a full season of ice hockey competition. PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the differences in aerobic and anaerobic capacity between male and female collegiate hockey players and the impact of a full season of competition on those differences. METHODS: Prior to the start of the season 57 NCAA Division 1 hockey players (28 men, 28 women) completed a VO2 max test and a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT). Included participants then completed the same tests after the ending of the season (15 men; Age = 22.1 ± 1.28 yrs; Ht = 1.85 ± 0.87 m; Wt = 88.55 ± 9.12 kg/14 women; Age = 20.16 ± 1.28 yrs; Ht = 1.67 ± 0.06; Wt = 66.02 ± 6.98 kg). RESULTS: Relative mean power (RMP; W/kg), relative peak power (RPP; W/kg), and fatigue index (FI;%) were used as WAnT performance variables. Preseason VO2 max (Men = 55.16 ± 4.18 ml/kg/min; Women = 45.40 ± 5.08 ml/kg/min) was not significantly different from postseason VO2 (Men = 52.65 ± 4.25 ml/kg/min; Women = 46.47 ± 5.88 ml/kg/min) in either gender. Men did have a significantly higher VO2 max at both time points (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in RPP (Men Pre/Post = 15.27 ± 5.26/12.98 ± 3.78 W/kg; Women Pre/Post = 12.97 ± 10.25/16.40 ± 11.27 W/kg), RMP (Men Pre/Post = 8.76 ± 0.95/8.21 ± 0.83; Women Pre/Post = 6.75 ± 1.09/7.10 ± 0.91) or FI (Men Pre/Post = 66.16 ± 22.72/68.06 ± 22.93 %; Women Pre/Post = 56.63 ± 26.58/60.73 ± 6.57 %) between pre and post season for either gender. Men demonstrated a significantly higher RMP than women (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed between genders regarding RPP (0.791) or FI (p = 0.250). CONCLUSION: A season of ice hockey is not an appropriate stimulus to increase VO2 or Wingate variables in men or women.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of St. Thomas - Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.