The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0‐VI

<b>Introduction</b>:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. <b>Methods</b>: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. <b>Results</b>: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. <b>Discussion</b>: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251375862
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0‐VI

Susan E. Mackinnon, Erica B. Lee, Noah S. Llaneras, Stahs Pripotnev et al.
2 citations
Plastic Surgery
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
4.01
article

The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0‐VI

Susan E. Mackinnon, Erica B. Lee, Noah S. Llaneras, Stahs Pripotnev, Michelle Seu, Megan W. Patterson, Bob Teixeira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. <b>Methods</b>: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. <b>Results</b>: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. <b>Discussion</b>: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.

Plastic Surgery
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Western University (CA), Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Jewish Hospital (US), Hand and Upper Limb Clinic (CA), University of North Carolina Hospitals (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.