Exploring Reciprocity Test in Surface Waves: Implications for 1D Velocity Inversion

Abstract This study explores the use of reciprocity in surface wave inversion, a concept more commonly applied in traveltime tomography. We compare 1D shear-wave velocity models from reciprocal shots recorded on the same seismic line to test how consistent the results are. Using field data from 121 geophones and two shots placed on opposite ends of the array, we extract and invert dispersion curves to produce velocity models. The results from both shots show good agreement, especially at greater depths, confirming that reciprocity can help validate inversion results. When differences occur, they are usually caused by noise, near-surface complexity, or overlapping wave modes. These findings suggest that while 1D inversion is reliable under simple conditions, more advanced methods like 2D inversion may be needed in complex areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/227469-ms
Primary Topic
Seismic Waves and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Reciprocity Test in Surface Waves: Implications for 1D Velocity Inversion

Sherif M. Hanafy, L. S. Gallegos
Seismic Waves and Analysis
article

Exploring Reciprocity Test in Surface Waves: Implications for 1D Velocity Inversion

Sherif M. Hanafy, L. S. Gallegos
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the use of reciprocity in surface wave inversion, a concept more commonly applied in traveltime tomography. We compare 1D shear-wave velocity models from reciprocal shots recorded on the same seismic line to test how consistent the results are. Using field data from 121 geophones and two shots placed on opposite ends of the array, we extract and invert dispersion curves to produce velocity models. The results from both shots show good agreement, especially at greater depths, confirming that reciprocity can help validate inversion results. When differences occur, they are usually caused by noise, near-surface complexity, or overlapping wave modes. These findings suggest that while 1D inversion is reliable under simple conditions, more advanced methods like 2D inversion may be needed in complex areas.

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Seismic Waves and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.