Failure in Sport for Development and Peace

Sport for development and peace (SDP) organizations aim to use sport as a means of fostering a range of positive societal outcomes, yet researchers have suggested that existing research and evaluative practices are troublesome with minimal reporting around mistakes and unintended negative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the notion of failure in SDP from practitioners’ perspectives. Data were collected from 28 SDP leaders through semistructured interviews. The findings highlight how practitioners define failure in the context of SDP, their experiences of failure, and the lessons learned from those experiences. Furthermore, a set of strategies were identified for how SDP leaders can manage failure to stimulate learning and innovation, which can improve program outcomes and sustainability. The findings also have critical implications for funders and support agencies to transform existing funding systems and processes to be more receptive to the inherent uncertainty involved in SDP work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sport Management
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2024-0438
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure in Sport for Development and Peace

Per G. Svensson, Katherine Raw, Olivia Bramley
3 citations
Journal of Sport Management
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
12.60
article

Failure in Sport for Development and Peace

Per G. Svensson, Katherine Raw, Olivia Bramley
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Sport for development and peace (SDP) organizations aim to use sport as a means of fostering a range of positive societal outcomes, yet researchers have suggested that existing research and evaluative practices are troublesome with minimal reporting around mistakes and unintended negative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the notion of failure in SDP from practitioners’ perspectives. Data were collected from 28 SDP leaders through semistructured interviews. The findings highlight how practitioners define failure in the context of SDP, their experiences of failure, and the lessons learned from those experiences. Furthermore, a set of strategies were identified for how SDP leaders can manage failure to stimulate learning and innovation, which can improve program outcomes and sustainability. The findings also have critical implications for funders and support agencies to transform existing funding systems and processes to be more receptive to the inherent uncertainty involved in SDP work.

Journal of Sport ManagementVol. 40(2)
Louisiana State University (US), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Failure in Sport for Development and Peace — Per G. Svensson, Katherine Raw, et al. · Journal of Sport Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS