Utilization of Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer to Dry Water Based Drill Cuttings

Abstract Oil and Gas drilling rigs use waste pits on location for capturing drill cuttings and all liquid waste discharge. Closed loop drilling practices have been successfully demonstrated to greatly reduce the volume of liquid waste and separate from the water-based cuttings (WBC) using mechanical dryers’ equipment. After extensive lab and field evaluation an Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer (AHP) was used to effectively dry WBC using a method that is more economical than mechanical dryers. Wide lab testing on multiple WBC were performed In-house in order to verify the absorbent properties of the hydrophilic polymer. WBC samples for different wells were collected and analyzed at the lab before and after the AHP treatment. Lab results showed absorption of the liquid phase with minimal AHP dose concentrations. Once the AHP performance was verified at the lab, we moved to the field evaluation. A candidate well was identified and 35 cubic meters of WBC were collected and treated. Key performance indicators (KPI’s) were established as part of the evaluation criteria to assess the AHP performance. A telehandler and bucket mixer were used on the field trial to estimate mixing time, assess the consistency of stabilized cuttings and determine the desired concentration of the AHP. The volume of cuttings treated (35 cubic meters) required an average AHP concentration of 0.62% (397.6 kg) and an average mixing time of 4 minutes. Additionally, an economical comparison between employing drying shakers and using AHP per well was done, taking into consideration that with drying shakers, all equipment and personnel costs are charged every day from rig up until rig down. With AHP utilization it is charged per used consumption meaning that the less cuttings come to surface, the less AHP is used and only while drilling. Thus, the cost reduces for a product that is dry, stackable and easily managed. In summary, after evaluating the collected data at the field and comparing with the established KPI’s for the field evaluation, it was concluded that all KPI’s were accomplished: field trial was conducted in a safe and controlled matter, usage was tracked and reported, WBC were stabilized and stackable after the treatment, no more than 20 kg per cubic meter were used and we observed full absorption of WBC’s liquid phase. This paper describes the utilization of Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer to dry water-based cuttings and the excellent performance observed of this technology, contributing in the optimization of the waste management and minimization quest.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/227000-ms
Primary Topic
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer to Dry Water Based Drill Cuttings

Cheryl A. Miller, Saudi Aramco, Tulio Olivares, Abdullah S. Saegh et al.
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
article

Utilization of Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer to Dry Water Based Drill Cuttings

Cheryl A. Miller, Saudi Aramco, Tulio Olivares, Abdullah S. Saegh, Abdulaziz S. Alluhaydan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Oil and Gas drilling rigs use waste pits on location for capturing drill cuttings and all liquid waste discharge. Closed loop drilling practices have been successfully demonstrated to greatly reduce the volume of liquid waste and separate from the water-based cuttings (WBC) using mechanical dryers’ equipment. After extensive lab and field evaluation an Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer (AHP) was used to effectively dry WBC using a method that is more economical than mechanical dryers. Wide lab testing on multiple WBC were performed In-house in order to verify the absorbent properties of the hydrophilic polymer. WBC samples for different wells were collected and analyzed at the lab before and after the AHP treatment. Lab results showed absorption of the liquid phase with minimal AHP dose concentrations. Once the AHP performance was verified at the lab, we moved to the field evaluation. A candidate well was identified and 35 cubic meters of WBC were collected and treated. Key performance indicators (KPI’s) were established as part of the evaluation criteria to assess the AHP performance. A telehandler and bucket mixer were used on the field trial to estimate mixing time, assess the consistency of stabilized cuttings and determine the desired concentration of the AHP. The volume of cuttings treated (35 cubic meters) required an average AHP concentration of 0.62% (397.6 kg) and an average mixing time of 4 minutes. Additionally, an economical comparison between employing drying shakers and using AHP per well was done, taking into consideration that with drying shakers, all equipment and personnel costs are charged every day from rig up until rig down. With AHP utilization it is charged per used consumption meaning that the less cuttings come to surface, the less AHP is used and only while drilling. Thus, the cost reduces for a product that is dry, stackable and easily managed. In summary, after evaluating the collected data at the field and comparing with the established KPI’s for the field evaluation, it was concluded that all KPI’s were accomplished: field trial was conducted in a safe and controlled matter, usage was tracked and reported, WBC were stabilized and stackable after the treatment, no more than 20 kg per cubic meter were used and we observed full absorption of WBC’s liquid phase. This paper describes the utilization of Absorbent Hydrophilic Polymer to dry water-based cuttings and the excellent performance observed of this technology, contributing in the optimization of the waste management and minimization quest.

Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.