Comparison Of REDs Risk Factors In Physique Focused And Non-Physique Focused Collegiate Athletes In The DFW Metroplex

Physique-focused (PF) sports have a higher emphasis on aesthetics as an aspect for performance compared to non-physique-focused (NPF) sports. PF sports emphasize body image, leading athletes to prioritize leanness or low body weight, which could put them at increased risk for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). PURPOSE: This study aims to compare weight, body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), and EDE-Q global score between PF and NPF athletes to assess potential REDs risk. METHODS: 35 current Division I or II collegiate athletes from the DFW metroplex participated in this study. During a morning fasted visit (0700-0900), participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) 6.0, body composition measurements via BIA (fat mass, FM; skeletal muscle mass, SKM), and DXA scans at the spine, dual femur and total body for BMD. Data were analyzed between groups using an independent t-test. RESULTS: 18 PF athletes (age 20.1 ± 1.6 y, n = 1 male) and 17 NPF athletes (age 20.4 ± 1.5 y, n = 4 males) have completed this study. Body weight was significantly lower in PF (67.9 ± 10.4 kg) compared to NPF (83.2 ± 15.5 kg, p = 0.002). And although FM was not different between PF (18.5 ± 7.9 kg) and NPF (22.6 ± 8.9 kg, p = 0.162), SKM was significantly lower in PF (23.1 ± 4.1 kg) compared to NPF (29.5 ± 6.9 kg, p = 0.003). Surprisingly, BMD (g/cm2) was significantly higher in PF athletes at the spine (1.51 ± 0.11 vs 1.31 ± 0.14, p < 0.001), hip (1.34 ± 0.14 vs 1.15 ± 0.18, p = 0.001), and total body (1.40 ± 0.13 vs 1.20 ± 0.12, p < 0.001) compared to NPF athletes. The EDE-Q global score was not different between PF (1.15 ± 1.35) and NPF athletes (0.64 ± 0.77, p = 0.182). Based on IOC REDs CAT2 criteria, REDS risk was not different between these two groups of PF and NPF athletes (p = 0.893). Overall, there were 20 athletes in the ‘green,’ 14 ‘yellow,’ and 1 ‘orange’ classification. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight differences in SKM and BMD between PF and NPF athletes, but REDs risk and disordered eating behaviors did not significantly differ between groups. This suggests that the relationship between sport type and REDs risk may be more complex than previously understood. Future research should explore the mechanisms influencing REDs development across different sports and how sport-specific demands contribute to these health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155300.91656.be
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of REDs Risk Factors In Physique Focused And Non-Physique Focused Collegiate Athletes In The DFW Metroplex

Jason A. Stephens, Sarah E. Deemer, Diana E. Kolb, Nicole L. Cipriano et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison Of REDs Risk Factors In Physique Focused And Non-Physique Focused Collegiate Athletes In The DFW Metroplex

Jason A. Stephens, Sarah E. Deemer, Diana E. Kolb, Nicole L. Cipriano, Ross Moody, Nicholas A. Lopez
article en

Abstract

Physique-focused (PF) sports have a higher emphasis on aesthetics as an aspect for performance compared to non-physique-focused (NPF) sports. PF sports emphasize body image, leading athletes to prioritize leanness or low body weight, which could put them at increased risk for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). PURPOSE: This study aims to compare weight, body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), and EDE-Q global score between PF and NPF athletes to assess potential REDs risk. METHODS: 35 current Division I or II collegiate athletes from the DFW metroplex participated in this study. During a morning fasted visit (0700-0900), participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) 6.0, body composition measurements via BIA (fat mass, FM; skeletal muscle mass, SKM), and DXA scans at the spine, dual femur and total body for BMD. Data were analyzed between groups using an independent t-test. RESULTS: 18 PF athletes (age 20.1 ± 1.6 y, n = 1 male) and 17 NPF athletes (age 20.4 ± 1.5 y, n = 4 males) have completed this study. Body weight was significantly lower in PF (67.9 ± 10.4 kg) compared to NPF (83.2 ± 15.5 kg, p = 0.002). And although FM was not different between PF (18.5 ± 7.9 kg) and NPF (22.6 ± 8.9 kg, p = 0.162), SKM was significantly lower in PF (23.1 ± 4.1 kg) compared to NPF (29.5 ± 6.9 kg, p = 0.003). Surprisingly, BMD (g/cm2) was significantly higher in PF athletes at the spine (1.51 ± 0.11 vs 1.31 ± 0.14, p < 0.001), hip (1.34 ± 0.14 vs 1.15 ± 0.18, p = 0.001), and total body (1.40 ± 0.13 vs 1.20 ± 0.12, p < 0.001) compared to NPF athletes. The EDE-Q global score was not different between PF (1.15 ± 1.35) and NPF athletes (0.64 ± 0.77, p = 0.182). Based on IOC REDs CAT2 criteria, REDS risk was not different between these two groups of PF and NPF athletes (p = 0.893). Overall, there were 20 athletes in the ‘green,’ 14 ‘yellow,’ and 1 ‘orange’ classification. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight differences in SKM and BMD between PF and NPF athletes, but REDs risk and disordered eating behaviors did not significantly differ between groups. This suggests that the relationship between sport type and REDs risk may be more complex than previously understood. Future research should explore the mechanisms influencing REDs development across different sports and how sport-specific demands contribute to these health outcomes.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of North Texas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.