Between Sustainability, Energy Practices and Class Dynamics: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Energy Consumption in Norway

This article studies the social stratification of energy practices, using Bourdieu’s model of social space and class. This is done through 37 interviews conducted in 2022–2023 during the energy crisis, in Oslo, Norway. Interviewees were recruited using an occupational-based class scheme. Based on the data, a bottom-up typology shows how aspects of lifestyle organize energy practices, evidenced by classed lifestyles and household demographics. A crude distinction between the upper and lower classes lies in the ability of the former to engage in a wider variety of practices and to highlight the symbolic value of their performances. For the lower classes, energy practices are not performed for distinction, but out of necessity. By revealing these differences, the article argues for the need for social practice theory to more extensively study the social stratification of energy practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251365485
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Sustainability, Energy Practices and Class Dynamics: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Energy Consumption in Norway

Eivind Hjort Matthiasen
Sociology
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

Between Sustainability, Energy Practices and Class Dynamics: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Energy Consumption in Norway

Eivind Hjort Matthiasen
article en

Abstract

This article studies the social stratification of energy practices, using Bourdieu’s model of social space and class. This is done through 37 interviews conducted in 2022–2023 during the energy crisis, in Oslo, Norway. Interviewees were recruited using an occupational-based class scheme. Based on the data, a bottom-up typology shows how aspects of lifestyle organize energy practices, evidenced by classed lifestyles and household demographics. A crude distinction between the upper and lower classes lies in the ability of the former to engage in a wider variety of practices and to highlight the symbolic value of their performances. For the lower classes, energy practices are not performed for distinction, but out of necessity. By revealing these differences, the article argues for the need for social practice theory to more extensively study the social stratification of energy practices.

SociologyVol. 60(2)
University of Oslo (NO), Fridtjof Nansen Institute (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.