Single-leg Backward Hopping Imposes Greater Knee Demands Compared To Forward Hopping In ACLR Patients

Practitioners commonly use single-leg forward hopping distances to evaluate knee function in patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, symmetric forward hopping distances cannot ensure symmetric bilateral strength and movement patterns. Recently, single-leg backward hopping was found to impose greater mechanical demands on the knee compared to forward hopping, suggesting the potential of using single-leg backward hopping to better assess knee strength and mechanics in patients who underwent ACL reconstructions (ACLR). PURPOSE: To quantify knee mechanics during single-leg forward and backward hopping in ACLR patients in comparison to healthy controls. METHODS: Fifteen female participants were recruited with 8 unilateral ACLR patients (33.8 ± 22.1 months after ACLR, age 20.2 ± 1.5 yr, height 1.6 ± 0.1 m, and mass 69.2 ± 14.3 kg) and 7 healthy controls (age 19.6 ± 1.3 yr, height 1.7 ± 0.0 m, and mass 67.1 ± 16.0 kg). Participants performed single-leg forward and backward hopping for distance on each leg with motion and force data collected. The hopping distance, peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and knee power were calculated during the jumping phase. Results were reported for each leg in ACLR patients and the average of both legs in healthy controls. RESULTS: Single-leg backward hopping demonstrated greater peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and knee power than forward hopping, regardless of legs and groups (Table 1). The decreasing order of knee mechanical variables were healthy controls, uninvolved knee, and involved knee in single-leg backward hopping. The uninvolved knee showed greater knee mechanical variables than the involved knee in both forward and backward hopping. CONCLUSION: Single-leg backward hopping imposes greater knee demands than forward hopping in ACLR patients and healthy controls, indicating a more challenging task to assess knee function in individuals following ACL injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157516.88248.63
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-leg Backward Hopping Imposes Greater Knee Demands Compared To Forward Hopping In ACLR Patients

Boyi Dai, Ashley A. Herda, Bryan G. Vopat, Samantha Richter et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Single-leg Backward Hopping Imposes Greater Knee Demands Compared To Forward Hopping In ACLR Patients

Boyi Dai, Ashley A. Herda, Bryan G. Vopat, Samantha Richter, Lisa Vopat, Yu Qiu Song, W. Su, Yu Gu
article en

Abstract

Practitioners commonly use single-leg forward hopping distances to evaluate knee function in patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, symmetric forward hopping distances cannot ensure symmetric bilateral strength and movement patterns. Recently, single-leg backward hopping was found to impose greater mechanical demands on the knee compared to forward hopping, suggesting the potential of using single-leg backward hopping to better assess knee strength and mechanics in patients who underwent ACL reconstructions (ACLR). PURPOSE: To quantify knee mechanics during single-leg forward and backward hopping in ACLR patients in comparison to healthy controls. METHODS: Fifteen female participants were recruited with 8 unilateral ACLR patients (33.8 ± 22.1 months after ACLR, age 20.2 ± 1.5 yr, height 1.6 ± 0.1 m, and mass 69.2 ± 14.3 kg) and 7 healthy controls (age 19.6 ± 1.3 yr, height 1.7 ± 0.0 m, and mass 67.1 ± 16.0 kg). Participants performed single-leg forward and backward hopping for distance on each leg with motion and force data collected. The hopping distance, peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and knee power were calculated during the jumping phase. Results were reported for each leg in ACLR patients and the average of both legs in healthy controls. RESULTS: Single-leg backward hopping demonstrated greater peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and knee power than forward hopping, regardless of legs and groups (Table 1). The decreasing order of knee mechanical variables were healthy controls, uninvolved knee, and involved knee in single-leg backward hopping. The uninvolved knee showed greater knee mechanical variables than the involved knee in both forward and backward hopping. CONCLUSION: Single-leg backward hopping imposes greater knee demands than forward hopping in ACLR patients and healthy controls, indicating a more challenging task to assess knee function in individuals following ACL injuries.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Vermont (US), University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.