Blood Flow Restriction Training Induces Morphological And Strength ADAPTations In Military Personnel With Persistent Pain.

PURPOSE: Lower limb muscle strength is a key focus of rehabilitation from knee injuries, yet conventional heavy load resistance training (HL-RT) is often contraindicated due to pain. Low load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFR) is an alternative exercise modality that has induced positive musculoskeletal adaptations in the absence of heavy loads. However, the efficacy of intensive LL-BFR in the UK military rehabilitation care pathway remains unknown. This multi-centre (four study site) randomised control trial (RCT) was designed to test the hypothesis that LL-BFR will result in comparable morphological and strength adaptations versus HL-RT in patients undergoing a 3-week residential rehabilitation course. METHODS: Seventeen male UK military personnel (n = 8 LL-BFR, n = 9 HL-RT) with persistent knee pain received either a) twice-daily LL-BFR or b) a work-matched thrice-weekly HL-RT intervention. The primary outcome was quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle volume (via MRI imaging). Secondary outcomes included peak knee extensor torque during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and net peak force during an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Outcomes were assessed pre- (T1) and post- (T2) the 3-week intervention. A 2 x 2 (group x time) mixed ANOVA assessed changes in outcome variables between T1 and T2, with magnitude of change reported as a percentage. RESULTS: There were no between group differences at baseline. QF volume increased from T1 to T2 in the LL-BFR (7.9 ± 2.6%, p < .001) and HL-RT group (4.6 ± 4.0%, p = .004), with no group x time interaction (p = .085). Knee extensor MVIC and IMTP net peak force increased from T1 to T2 in the LL-BFR group (31.2 ± 20.0%, p < .001, and 17.9 ± 8.2%, p < .001, respectively), but not in the HL-RT group (14.1 ± 20.5%, p = .085, and 5.9 ± 14.5%, p = .145, respectively), with a significant group x time interaction for MVIC (p = .026) and IMTP (p = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that high frequency LL-BFR produces a comparable increase in QF muscle volume (hypertrophy), but greater improvements in measures of muscle strength versus HL-RT in individuals with persistent knee pain. Performing twice-daily LL-BFR over a short duration (3-weeks) may provide a suitable alternative training modality, particularly when heavy loads are unattainable due to pain or functional limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156532.51560.ef
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Flow Restriction Training Induces Morphological And Strength ADAPTations In Military Personnel With Persistent Pain.

Peter Ladlow, Russell J Coppack, R P Cassidy, James Bilzon et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Blood Flow Restriction Training Induces Morphological And Strength ADAPTations In Military Personnel With Persistent Pain.

Peter Ladlow, Russell J Coppack, R P Cassidy, James Bilzon, Kieran M. Lunt, Alexander N. Bennett, M. Polly McGuigan
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lower limb muscle strength is a key focus of rehabilitation from knee injuries, yet conventional heavy load resistance training (HL-RT) is often contraindicated due to pain. Low load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFR) is an alternative exercise modality that has induced positive musculoskeletal adaptations in the absence of heavy loads. However, the efficacy of intensive LL-BFR in the UK military rehabilitation care pathway remains unknown. This multi-centre (four study site) randomised control trial (RCT) was designed to test the hypothesis that LL-BFR will result in comparable morphological and strength adaptations versus HL-RT in patients undergoing a 3-week residential rehabilitation course. METHODS: Seventeen male UK military personnel (n = 8 LL-BFR, n = 9 HL-RT) with persistent knee pain received either a) twice-daily LL-BFR or b) a work-matched thrice-weekly HL-RT intervention. The primary outcome was quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle volume (via MRI imaging). Secondary outcomes included peak knee extensor torque during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and net peak force during an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Outcomes were assessed pre- (T1) and post- (T2) the 3-week intervention. A 2 x 2 (group x time) mixed ANOVA assessed changes in outcome variables between T1 and T2, with magnitude of change reported as a percentage. RESULTS: There were no between group differences at baseline. QF volume increased from T1 to T2 in the LL-BFR (7.9 ± 2.6%, p < .001) and HL-RT group (4.6 ± 4.0%, p = .004), with no group x time interaction (p = .085). Knee extensor MVIC and IMTP net peak force increased from T1 to T2 in the LL-BFR group (31.2 ± 20.0%, p < .001, and 17.9 ± 8.2%, p < .001, respectively), but not in the HL-RT group (14.1 ± 20.5%, p = .085, and 5.9 ± 14.5%, p = .145, respectively), with a significant group x time interaction for MVIC (p = .026) and IMTP (p = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that high frequency LL-BFR produces a comparable increase in QF muscle volume (hypertrophy), but greater improvements in measures of muscle strength versus HL-RT in individuals with persistent knee pain. Performing twice-daily LL-BFR over a short duration (3-weeks) may provide a suitable alternative training modality, particularly when heavy loads are unattainable due to pain or functional limitations.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.