5 k Cycling Performance Under Hot-dry Vs Warm-humid Conditions With Matched WBGT

Previous research demonstrates that heat stress impairs athletic performance, impacting effectiveness and outcomes in competitive events. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is widely recommended for assessing heat stress in athletic events because it integrates temperature, humidity, wind, and solar radiation to provide a comprehensive measure of environmental stress. However, the impact of varying temperature and humidity levels on performance with matched WBGT has not yet been evaluated. PURPOSE: Evaluate 5 k cycling performance in two different environmental conditions, hot-dry (HD: 39.2 °C, 30% RH) and warm-humid (WH: 34.2 °C, 55% RH), with matched WBGT (30 °C) to determine the impact of physiological strain and performance outcomes. METHODS: Nine healthy, active, non-heat-acclimatized males (29 ± 7 y, 77.4 ± 9.3 kg, 178.9 ± 10.5 cm, 51.9 ± 5.3 mL/kg/min VO2peak), completed two randomized, crossover trials. Each trial involved 60 minutes of cycling at 55% VO2peak, followed by a 5 k time trial with constant 3% incline. Performance was assessed using average power, speed, and finish time during the 5 k time trial. To assess physiological strain, maximal heart rate and rectal temperature change were monitored during the 5 k time trial. Data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests with significance set to p < .05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in average power (HD: 214.1 ± 50.7 W, WH: 225.5 ± 49.3 W, p = .39) speed (HD: 18.6 ± 3.5 mph, WH: 19.5 ± 3.3 mph, p = .37) or finish time (HD: 16.67 ± 3.46 min, WH: 15.81 ± 2.72 min, p = .457) between the HD and WH conditions. Physiological responses, including max heart rate (HD: 186 ± 7 bpm, WH: 187 ± 5 bpm, p = .68) and the change in rectal temperature (HD: 0.38 ± 0.18 °C, WH: 0.21 ± 0.17 °C, p = .10) during the 5 k showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: When WBGT was matched, 5 k cycling performance and physiological responses were minimally impacted in HD compared to WH conditions. These findings indicate that similar 5 k cycling performance across diverse environments supports WBGT as an effective single metric for assessing heat stress in short-duration events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157836.30097.e7
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

5 k Cycling Performance Under Hot-dry Vs Warm-humid Conditions With Matched WBGT

Cory L. Butts, Brendon P. McDermott, Xiujing Zhao, Shawn C. Wierick
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

5 k Cycling Performance Under Hot-dry Vs Warm-humid Conditions With Matched WBGT

Cory L. Butts, Brendon P. McDermott, Xiujing Zhao, Shawn C. Wierick
article en

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that heat stress impairs athletic performance, impacting effectiveness and outcomes in competitive events. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is widely recommended for assessing heat stress in athletic events because it integrates temperature, humidity, wind, and solar radiation to provide a comprehensive measure of environmental stress. However, the impact of varying temperature and humidity levels on performance with matched WBGT has not yet been evaluated. PURPOSE: Evaluate 5 k cycling performance in two different environmental conditions, hot-dry (HD: 39.2 °C, 30% RH) and warm-humid (WH: 34.2 °C, 55% RH), with matched WBGT (30 °C) to determine the impact of physiological strain and performance outcomes. METHODS: Nine healthy, active, non-heat-acclimatized males (29 ± 7 y, 77.4 ± 9.3 kg, 178.9 ± 10.5 cm, 51.9 ± 5.3 mL/kg/min VO2peak), completed two randomized, crossover trials. Each trial involved 60 minutes of cycling at 55% VO2peak, followed by a 5 k time trial with constant 3% incline. Performance was assessed using average power, speed, and finish time during the 5 k time trial. To assess physiological strain, maximal heart rate and rectal temperature change were monitored during the 5 k time trial. Data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests with significance set to p < .05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in average power (HD: 214.1 ± 50.7 W, WH: 225.5 ± 49.3 W, p = .39) speed (HD: 18.6 ± 3.5 mph, WH: 19.5 ± 3.3 mph, p = .37) or finish time (HD: 16.67 ± 3.46 min, WH: 15.81 ± 2.72 min, p = .457) between the HD and WH conditions. Physiological responses, including max heart rate (HD: 186 ± 7 bpm, WH: 187 ± 5 bpm, p = .68) and the change in rectal temperature (HD: 0.38 ± 0.18 °C, WH: 0.21 ± 0.17 °C, p = .10) during the 5 k showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: When WBGT was matched, 5 k cycling performance and physiological responses were minimally impacted in HD compared to WH conditions. These findings indicate that similar 5 k cycling performance across diverse environments supports WBGT as an effective single metric for assessing heat stress in short-duration events.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.