Association Between Carotid Artery Response To Cold Pressor Test And Peripheral Vascular Endothelial Function

In healthy individuals, the coronary artery typically responds to the cold pressor test (CPT) with vasodilation, whereas in patients with cardiovascular disease, the coronary arteries constrict in response to the same stimulus. Given the similarity between the coronary artery and carotid artery responses to the CPT, along with the challenges in measuring coronary artery response directly, the carotid artery response to the CPT may be useful as a predictive measure for assessing cardiovascular disease risk. However, the physiological mechanism underlying the differences in carotid artery responses between healthy individuals and those at high risk of cardiovascular disease remain unclear. It is possible that differences in internal carotid artery (ICA) reactivity to the CPT are mirrored by changes in peripheral artery function. PURPOSE: To test our hypothesis, this study aimed to clarify whether individual differences in ICA response to the CPT are associated with variations in peripheral endothelial function and to providing insight into the physiological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. METHODS:Seventeen young healthy individuals (10 males and 7 females, mean age: 21.8 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. We measured cerebral and peripheral flow-mediated dilation (FMD) as well as cerebral impedance. Following these measurements, the CPT was conducted, and the response in ICA diameter was assessed using Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in peripheral FMD between participants who exhibited ICA vasodilation (n = 9) and those who exhibited vasoconstriction (n = 8) in response to the CPT (dilation vs. constriction groups, 9.88 ± 5.69% vs. 8.28 ± 1.55%; P = 0.12). No correlation was observed between peripheral FMD and ICA response (r = 0.12, P = 0.96). Additionally, no correlation was found between cerebral FMD (3.98 ± 2.16% vs. 3.61 ± 2.99%; dilation vs. constriction groups), cerebral impedance (0.93 ± 0.19 mmHg·sec·cm-1 vs. 0.98 ± 0.31 mmHg·sec·cm-1; dilation vs. constriction group), and ICA response to the CPT. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the ICA response to the CPT is not associated with peripheral vascular endothelial function in healthy adults. Supported by: Supported by JSPS KAKENHI 22H03470

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001154840.82827.13
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Carotid Artery Response To Cold Pressor Test And Peripheral Vascular Endothelial Function

Manabu Shibasaki, Ai Hirasawa, Shigeki Shibata, Keisho Katayama et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Association Between Carotid Artery Response To Cold Pressor Test And Peripheral Vascular Endothelial Function

Manabu Shibasaki, Ai Hirasawa, Shigeki Shibata, Keisho Katayama, Go Ito, Jun Sugawara, Shigehiko Ogoh, Hayato Tsukamoto, Erika Iwamoto, Ellen A. Dawson, Tomoki Watada, Tadayoshi Miyamoto, Narumi Kunimatsu, A. Shimada, Marina Feeley, Shogo Tsubota
article en

Abstract

In healthy individuals, the coronary artery typically responds to the cold pressor test (CPT) with vasodilation, whereas in patients with cardiovascular disease, the coronary arteries constrict in response to the same stimulus. Given the similarity between the coronary artery and carotid artery responses to the CPT, along with the challenges in measuring coronary artery response directly, the carotid artery response to the CPT may be useful as a predictive measure for assessing cardiovascular disease risk. However, the physiological mechanism underlying the differences in carotid artery responses between healthy individuals and those at high risk of cardiovascular disease remain unclear. It is possible that differences in internal carotid artery (ICA) reactivity to the CPT are mirrored by changes in peripheral artery function. PURPOSE: To test our hypothesis, this study aimed to clarify whether individual differences in ICA response to the CPT are associated with variations in peripheral endothelial function and to providing insight into the physiological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. METHODS:Seventeen young healthy individuals (10 males and 7 females, mean age: 21.8 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. We measured cerebral and peripheral flow-mediated dilation (FMD) as well as cerebral impedance. Following these measurements, the CPT was conducted, and the response in ICA diameter was assessed using Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in peripheral FMD between participants who exhibited ICA vasodilation (n = 9) and those who exhibited vasoconstriction (n = 8) in response to the CPT (dilation vs. constriction groups, 9.88 ± 5.69% vs. 8.28 ± 1.55%; P = 0.12). No correlation was observed between peripheral FMD and ICA response (r = 0.12, P = 0.96). Additionally, no correlation was found between cerebral FMD (3.98 ± 2.16% vs. 3.61 ± 2.99%; dilation vs. constriction groups), cerebral impedance (0.93 ± 0.19 mmHg·sec·cm-1 vs. 0.98 ± 0.31 mmHg·sec·cm-1; dilation vs. constriction group), and ICA response to the CPT. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the ICA response to the CPT is not associated with peripheral vascular endothelial function in healthy adults. Supported by: Supported by JSPS KAKENHI 22H03470

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Osaka Sangyo University (JP), Sapporo Medical University (JP), Waseda University (JP), Toyo University (JP), Kyorin University (JP), Nagoya University (JP), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP), Nara Women's University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.