The Cost Of Safety: Movements Limited By Police Protective Gear

Title: THE EFFECT OF POLICE OFFICER PROTECTIVE GEAR ON MOBILITY, STABILITY, AND POWER GENERATION Authors: Katherine A Frick, Philip Agostinelli, Nicholas Bordonie, Frances Neal, Dr. Brooks Mobley, Dr. JoEllen Sefton Institutions: Auburn University Abstract: PURPOSE: Protective gear is a critical part of the police officer uniform. The 9 kg + gear is cumbersome due to its rigidity and bulk, creating physical performance deficits. Mobility, balance, and power generation are essential to completion of an officer’s daily tasks. Few studies have assessed the effect of police protective gear on these important capabilities. Understanding the change in physical capabilities resulting from protective gear is critical to the safety and survival of the police officer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of protective gear on officer capabilities. METHODS: Police officers from a medium-sized city volunteered for this study (male = 68, female = 4; ages 21-65). Officers completed an 11-point assessment evaluating power generation, balance, functional movement, and flexibility in two conditions: athletic attire (No Gear) and uniform + protective equipment (Gear). Paired t-tests were conducted to evaluate police officers' movement capabilities in each condition. Balance testing analysis indicates officers in gear have significantly decreased stability in path length and mean velocity, but comparisons of standard ellipse areas indicated officers are able to compensate for this instability. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: Results indicate a significant decrease in performance in: vertical jump height (t71 = 13.51, p > 0.001), power generation per kg (t71 = 7.13, p > 0.001), modified pushup (t71 = 3.17, p = 0.002), overhead squat (t71 = 2.43, p = 0.018), and sit-and-reach length (t71 = 12.41, p > 0.001). Decreased physical capability in balance, mobility and power generation were apparent when comparing the “Gear” and “No-Gear” conditions. CONCLUSION: Decreased on-duty performance can affect officer safety and success. These results indicate the need for continued evaluation and improvement of police officer safety equipment to ensure mobility and safety. Grant or funding information: None Generative AI statement: None used

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001156580.28194.8b
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cost Of Safety: Movements Limited By Police Protective Gear

Katherine A. Frick
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Restraint-Related Deaths
article

The Cost Of Safety: Movements Limited By Police Protective Gear

Katherine A. Frick
article en

Abstract

Title: THE EFFECT OF POLICE OFFICER PROTECTIVE GEAR ON MOBILITY, STABILITY, AND POWER GENERATION Authors: Katherine A Frick, Philip Agostinelli, Nicholas Bordonie, Frances Neal, Dr. Brooks Mobley, Dr. JoEllen Sefton Institutions: Auburn University Abstract: PURPOSE: Protective gear is a critical part of the police officer uniform. The 9 kg + gear is cumbersome due to its rigidity and bulk, creating physical performance deficits. Mobility, balance, and power generation are essential to completion of an officer’s daily tasks. Few studies have assessed the effect of police protective gear on these important capabilities. Understanding the change in physical capabilities resulting from protective gear is critical to the safety and survival of the police officer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of protective gear on officer capabilities. METHODS: Police officers from a medium-sized city volunteered for this study (male = 68, female = 4; ages 21-65). Officers completed an 11-point assessment evaluating power generation, balance, functional movement, and flexibility in two conditions: athletic attire (No Gear) and uniform + protective equipment (Gear). Paired t-tests were conducted to evaluate police officers' movement capabilities in each condition. Balance testing analysis indicates officers in gear have significantly decreased stability in path length and mean velocity, but comparisons of standard ellipse areas indicated officers are able to compensate for this instability. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: Results indicate a significant decrease in performance in: vertical jump height (t71 = 13.51, p > 0.001), power generation per kg (t71 = 7.13, p > 0.001), modified pushup (t71 = 3.17, p = 0.002), overhead squat (t71 = 2.43, p = 0.018), and sit-and-reach length (t71 = 12.41, p > 0.001). Decreased physical capability in balance, mobility and power generation were apparent when comparing the “Gear” and “No-Gear” conditions. CONCLUSION: Decreased on-duty performance can affect officer safety and success. These results indicate the need for continued evaluation and improvement of police officer safety equipment to ensure mobility and safety. Grant or funding information: None Generative AI statement: None used

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Restraint-Related Deaths
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Cost Of Safety: Movements Limited By Police Protective Gear — Katherine A. Frick · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS