Training Belt Tightness, Perceptual Responses, And Performance Measures During Explosive Resistance Exercise

BACKGROUND: Training belts (TBs) are commonly used by competitive and recreational lifters during heavy-load resistance exercise for support. While TBs have been reported to increase intra-abdominal pressure and spine stabilization, it is unclear if differing belt tightness influences performance and perceptual measures during resistance exercise. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of TB tightness on perceptual and performance measures during dead-lift exercise. METHODS: Resistance-trained individuals participated in a crossover counterbalanced study design with 3 conditions: 1) No TB (control; CON), 2) Loose TB (LTB), 3) Tight training-belt (TTB). Under each condition, participants completed 3 sets of explosive deadlifts at 70% 1-RM. Barbell velocity and velocity loss were monitored for each rep using a linear position transducer. RPE, confidence, and stability were assessed after each set using a subjective feelings questionnaire. Each trial was separated by 48 hours. RESULTS: Regardless of the tightness, no differences for barbell velocity (p = 0.881), velocity loss (p = 0.452), or RPE (p = 0.850) were observed. However, TTB resulted in improved perceptions of stability (p = 0.042) and confidence (p = 0.046) compared to CON. No differences for the LTB and CON condition were observed. CONCLUSION: Neither the presence nor tightness of a TB influenced explosive lifting performance. However, wearing a TTB improved feelings of confidence and stability during lifting compared to CON suggesting that some psychological benefits may exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001161076.59309.37
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training Belt Tightness, Perceptual Responses, And Performance Measures During Explosive Resistance Exercise

Christopher G. Ballmann, Rebecca R. Rogers, Zachary H. Ervin
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Training Belt Tightness, Perceptual Responses, And Performance Measures During Explosive Resistance Exercise

Christopher G. Ballmann, Rebecca R. Rogers, Zachary H. Ervin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Training belts (TBs) are commonly used by competitive and recreational lifters during heavy-load resistance exercise for support. While TBs have been reported to increase intra-abdominal pressure and spine stabilization, it is unclear if differing belt tightness influences performance and perceptual measures during resistance exercise. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of TB tightness on perceptual and performance measures during dead-lift exercise. METHODS: Resistance-trained individuals participated in a crossover counterbalanced study design with 3 conditions: 1) No TB (control; CON), 2) Loose TB (LTB), 3) Tight training-belt (TTB). Under each condition, participants completed 3 sets of explosive deadlifts at 70% 1-RM. Barbell velocity and velocity loss were monitored for each rep using a linear position transducer. RPE, confidence, and stability were assessed after each set using a subjective feelings questionnaire. Each trial was separated by 48 hours. RESULTS: Regardless of the tightness, no differences for barbell velocity (p = 0.881), velocity loss (p = 0.452), or RPE (p = 0.850) were observed. However, TTB resulted in improved perceptions of stability (p = 0.042) and confidence (p = 0.046) compared to CON. No differences for the LTB and CON condition were observed. CONCLUSION: Neither the presence nor tightness of a TB influenced explosive lifting performance. However, wearing a TTB improved feelings of confidence and stability during lifting compared to CON suggesting that some psychological benefits may exist.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Training Belt Tightness, Perceptual Responses, And Performance Measures During Explosive Resistance Exercise — Christopher G. Ballmann, Rebecca R. Rogers, et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS