Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level May Affect Adaptations In Response To Heat Acclimation

BACKGROUND: A higher fitness level often comes with adaptations that may improve the response to heat stress relative to untrained individuals. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of fitness level on heat acclimation (HA) among American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) defined fitness categories. METHODS: Twenty-seven volunteers (Mean + SD; Age 23 + 5 yrs) completed a treadmill VO2max test. Volunteers were categorized into 3 groups based on ACSM guidelines: GOOD: (n = 8, 4 F; VO2max: 46.9 + 7.0 mL/kg/min), FAIR: (n = 13, 8 F; VO2max: 40.8 + 6.3 mL/kg/min), and POOR (n = 6, 4 F; VO2max: 34.9 + 4.7 mL/kg/min). Volunteers completed a 10-day walking HA protocol (120-min, 3.1 mph: 2% grade) in the heat (40 °C, 40% RH). Core temperature (Tc), heart rate (HR), and whole body sweat rate (WBSR) were collected on all days. Paired t-tests were used to compare peak Tc, peak HR, and WBSL between days 1 and 10 (D1, D10) for all volunteers when grouped. Two-way RM ANOVA was used to compare days D1 and D10 of HA across fitness categories for all variables. RESULTS: After HA, peak Tc (D1: 38.8 + 0.5 vs D10: 38.4 + 0.4 °C; p < 0.0001) and peak HR (D1: 57 + 20 vs D10: 43 + 21 bpm; p < 0.001) decreased in all volunteers, while WBSR increased (D1: 0.68 + 0.2 vs D10: 0.80 + 0.2 L/hr; p < 0.001). Peak Tc decreased on D10 compared to D1 in the GOOD (D1: 38.7 + 0.6 vs D10: 38.0 + 0.2 °C; p < 0.05) and FAIR groups (D1: 39.0 + 0.5 vs D10: 38.5 + 0.4 °C; p < 0.01). Peak HR was lower on D10 compared to D1 in both the GOOD (D1: 147 + 22 vs D10: 125 + 12 bpm; p < 0.01) and FAIR groups (D1: 163 + 19 vs D10: 144 + 16 bpm; p < 0.01). WBSR increased on D10 compared to D1 for the GOOD (D1: 0.65 + 0.24 vs D10: 0.82 + 0.26 L/hr; p < 0.05) and FAIR groups (D1: 0.65 + 0.12 vs D10: 0.77 + 0.12 L/hr; p < 0.05). Mean differences in the POOR fitness group were smaller and did not reach statistical significance due to small sample size. CONCLUSION: HA lowered peak Tc and HR, and increased WBSR in all volunteers regardless of fitness category using a controlled work rate protocol. Subgroup analysis suggested possible impact of fitness, with a higher fitness level potentially augmenting thermoregulatory and cardiovascular adaptations. However, more research is needed that is adequately powered for comparison among fitness levels. Funded by USAMRDC; Author views not representative of the Army/DOD. Supported by: Funded by USAMRDC (MO220032)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157732.78055.f6
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level May Affect Adaptations In Response To Heat Acclimation

Samantha J. Goldenstein, Benjamin J. Ryan, Kathryn G. McCarthy, David H. Gonzalez Rojas et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level May Affect Adaptations In Response To Heat Acclimation

Samantha J. Goldenstein, Benjamin J. Ryan, Kathryn G. McCarthy, David H. Gonzalez Rojas, Afton D. Seeley, Gabrielle E. W. Giersch, Andrew M. Greenfield, K. Riley Connor, Billie K. Alba, Roy M. Salgado, Shaun C. Brazelton, Phillip O. Bodurtha, MariaLena A. Shaw, Benjamin A. Fry, Nisha C. Simmons
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A higher fitness level often comes with adaptations that may improve the response to heat stress relative to untrained individuals. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of fitness level on heat acclimation (HA) among American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) defined fitness categories. METHODS: Twenty-seven volunteers (Mean + SD; Age 23 + 5 yrs) completed a treadmill VO2max test. Volunteers were categorized into 3 groups based on ACSM guidelines: GOOD: (n = 8, 4 F; VO2max: 46.9 + 7.0 mL/kg/min), FAIR: (n = 13, 8 F; VO2max: 40.8 + 6.3 mL/kg/min), and POOR (n = 6, 4 F; VO2max: 34.9 + 4.7 mL/kg/min). Volunteers completed a 10-day walking HA protocol (120-min, 3.1 mph: 2% grade) in the heat (40 °C, 40% RH). Core temperature (Tc), heart rate (HR), and whole body sweat rate (WBSR) were collected on all days. Paired t-tests were used to compare peak Tc, peak HR, and WBSL between days 1 and 10 (D1, D10) for all volunteers when grouped. Two-way RM ANOVA was used to compare days D1 and D10 of HA across fitness categories for all variables. RESULTS: After HA, peak Tc (D1: 38.8 + 0.5 vs D10: 38.4 + 0.4 °C; p < 0.0001) and peak HR (D1: 57 + 20 vs D10: 43 + 21 bpm; p < 0.001) decreased in all volunteers, while WBSR increased (D1: 0.68 + 0.2 vs D10: 0.80 + 0.2 L/hr; p < 0.001). Peak Tc decreased on D10 compared to D1 in the GOOD (D1: 38.7 + 0.6 vs D10: 38.0 + 0.2 °C; p < 0.05) and FAIR groups (D1: 39.0 + 0.5 vs D10: 38.5 + 0.4 °C; p < 0.01). Peak HR was lower on D10 compared to D1 in both the GOOD (D1: 147 + 22 vs D10: 125 + 12 bpm; p < 0.01) and FAIR groups (D1: 163 + 19 vs D10: 144 + 16 bpm; p < 0.01). WBSR increased on D10 compared to D1 for the GOOD (D1: 0.65 + 0.24 vs D10: 0.82 + 0.26 L/hr; p < 0.05) and FAIR groups (D1: 0.65 + 0.12 vs D10: 0.77 + 0.12 L/hr; p < 0.05). Mean differences in the POOR fitness group were smaller and did not reach statistical significance due to small sample size. CONCLUSION: HA lowered peak Tc and HR, and increased WBSR in all volunteers regardless of fitness category using a controlled work rate protocol. Subgroup analysis suggested possible impact of fitness, with a higher fitness level potentially augmenting thermoregulatory and cardiovascular adaptations. However, more research is needed that is adequately powered for comparison among fitness levels. Funded by USAMRDC; Author views not representative of the Army/DOD. Supported by: Funded by USAMRDC (MO220032)

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.