The Resistance Training Dose-response: Effects Of Weekly Volume On Muscle Hypertrophy

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis explored the nature of the continuous dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training (RT) set volume and muscle hypertrophy. METHODS: Each RT intervention included healthy participants <70 years old, utilized a dynamic (RT) intervention ≥4 weeks differing in set volume and/or frequency while controlling for other RT variables, and measured hypertrophy using a direct, site-specific measurement. All contributing RT sets were classified as direct or indirect: direct sets were those in which the measured muscle(s) was likely to be the primary force generator in the exercise while indirect sets were those in which the measured muscle(s) was likely to be meaningfully trained but not the primary force generator. Then, weekly set volume for indirect sets was quantified as 1 for ‘total,’ 0.5 for ‘fractional,’ and 0 for ‘direct.’ A series of multi-level meta-regressions were performed, with all models adjusted for frequency, intervention duration, and training status. RESULTS: The multi-level meta-regression models for the effect of weekly set volume on hypertrophy included 35 studies, 220 effects, and 1,032 participants. The relative evidence was strongest for the ‘fractional’ quantification method (2 x Log(BF) = 9.48 to 10.29). Model comparisons revealed the square root model was the best fit, with a marginal slope of 0.24% [95% CrI: 0.15%, 0.33%]. CONCLUSIONS: The best fit meta-regression model indicated a positive dose-response relationship whereby higher weekly ‘fractional’ set volumes resulted in greater muscle hypertrophy, though with diminishing returns. These findings align with previous meta-analytic work, and expands on them by including new data and exclusively site-specific, direct hypertrophy measures. No clear plateau in the dose-response relationship was identified; however, there is additional uncertainty at higher volumes, and the data remain compatible with multiple functional forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158628.17279.5f
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Resistance Training Dose-response: Effects Of Weekly Volume On Muscle Hypertrophy

Seth R. Hinson, Jacob F. Remmert, Zac P. Robinson, Joshua C. Pelland et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

The Resistance Training Dose-response: Effects Of Weekly Volume On Muscle Hypertrophy

Seth R. Hinson, Jacob F. Remmert, Zac P. Robinson, Joshua C. Pelland, Michael Christopher Zourdos, Alexandre A. Hamaïde
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis explored the nature of the continuous dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training (RT) set volume and muscle hypertrophy. METHODS: Each RT intervention included healthy participants <70 years old, utilized a dynamic (RT) intervention ≥4 weeks differing in set volume and/or frequency while controlling for other RT variables, and measured hypertrophy using a direct, site-specific measurement. All contributing RT sets were classified as direct or indirect: direct sets were those in which the measured muscle(s) was likely to be the primary force generator in the exercise while indirect sets were those in which the measured muscle(s) was likely to be meaningfully trained but not the primary force generator. Then, weekly set volume for indirect sets was quantified as 1 for ‘total,’ 0.5 for ‘fractional,’ and 0 for ‘direct.’ A series of multi-level meta-regressions were performed, with all models adjusted for frequency, intervention duration, and training status. RESULTS: The multi-level meta-regression models for the effect of weekly set volume on hypertrophy included 35 studies, 220 effects, and 1,032 participants. The relative evidence was strongest for the ‘fractional’ quantification method (2 x Log(BF) = 9.48 to 10.29). Model comparisons revealed the square root model was the best fit, with a marginal slope of 0.24% [95% CrI: 0.15%, 0.33%]. CONCLUSIONS: The best fit meta-regression model indicated a positive dose-response relationship whereby higher weekly ‘fractional’ set volumes resulted in greater muscle hypertrophy, though with diminishing returns. These findings align with previous meta-analytic work, and expands on them by including new data and exclusively site-specific, direct hypertrophy measures. No clear plateau in the dose-response relationship was identified; however, there is additional uncertainty at higher volumes, and the data remain compatible with multiple functional forms.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.