VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION DOES NOT ATTENUATE BLOOD PRESSURE REACTIVITY IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

PURPOSE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by progressive joint damage. Individuals with RA are at a greater risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Blood pressure reactivity (BPR) assessment may predict this increased risk. Alternative treatments such as transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) may reduce BPR in RA patients. However, the influence of tVNS on BPR has yet to be reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of tVNS on BPR in women with RA. METHODS: Three women diagnosed with RA (51 ± 5 years) volunteered to participate. BPR was assessed using the cold pressor test (CPT) at baseline and post tVNS. During the CPT, the participant’s hand was submerged into ice water (4-6 ° C) while both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were manually measured at 30 and 60 seconds. The highest values were recorded. Participants then performed daily tVNS treatment for 10 days. The tVNS stimulation was 20 minutes, using an earbud (Xen) paired to a mobile phone application (Neuvana). Significant differences between SBP and DBP during CPT at baseline and post tVNS were determined using Wilcoxin Signed Rank Tests. Significance was accepted a priori p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between baseline and post tVNS for SBP (baseline = 136 ± 21 mmHg, post tVNS = 135 ± 14 mmHg, p = 0.66) or DBP (baseline = 91 ± 29 mmHg, post tVNS = 93 ± 23 mmHg, p = 0.59) during the CPT. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that tVNS does not significantly attenuate BPR in women with RA as demonstrated by the CPT. However, a larger sample size is necessary to support these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157932.48028.13
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION DOES NOT ATTENUATE BLOOD PRESSURE REACTIVITY IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Sara Lynn Terrell, Erica M. Marshall, Nathan M. Holmes, Nicholas McConnell
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION DOES NOT ATTENUATE BLOOD PRESSURE REACTIVITY IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Sara Lynn Terrell, Erica M. Marshall, Nathan M. Holmes, Nicholas McConnell
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by progressive joint damage. Individuals with RA are at a greater risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Blood pressure reactivity (BPR) assessment may predict this increased risk. Alternative treatments such as transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) may reduce BPR in RA patients. However, the influence of tVNS on BPR has yet to be reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of tVNS on BPR in women with RA. METHODS: Three women diagnosed with RA (51 ± 5 years) volunteered to participate. BPR was assessed using the cold pressor test (CPT) at baseline and post tVNS. During the CPT, the participant’s hand was submerged into ice water (4-6 ° C) while both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were manually measured at 30 and 60 seconds. The highest values were recorded. Participants then performed daily tVNS treatment for 10 days. The tVNS stimulation was 20 minutes, using an earbud (Xen) paired to a mobile phone application (Neuvana). Significant differences between SBP and DBP during CPT at baseline and post tVNS were determined using Wilcoxin Signed Rank Tests. Significance was accepted a priori p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between baseline and post tVNS for SBP (baseline = 136 ± 21 mmHg, post tVNS = 135 ± 14 mmHg, p = 0.66) or DBP (baseline = 91 ± 29 mmHg, post tVNS = 93 ± 23 mmHg, p = 0.59) during the CPT. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that tVNS does not significantly attenuate BPR in women with RA as demonstrated by the CPT. However, a larger sample size is necessary to support these findings.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Florida Southern College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.