Reliability Of Handgrip Strength Measurements And Their Relationship With Physical Performance Outcomes In Older Women

Handgrip peak force and rate of force development (RFD) are effective measurements at characterizing the strength capacities of numerous muscle groups in the upper and lower extremities. Previous studies have determined the reliability of handgrip peak force and RFD in young, college-aged adults. However, the reliability of these measurements in older adults remains unclear. It is also unclear if these measurements are associated with performance during sit-to-stand and medicine ball throw tests. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the reliability of handgrip peak force and RFD measurements in older adults. A secondary aim was to determine if these measurements are related to sit-to-stand peak power and medicine ball throw distance. METHODS: Twenty older women (67.8 ± 5.8 years) reported for testing on two different occasions. For each testing session, participants completed five sit-to-stands, three seated medicine ball throws, and three handgrip maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Estimated peak power output was measured during the sit-to-stands using a linear velocity transducer. The distance of each medicine ball throw was recorded with a tape measure. Handgrip MVCs were performed using a novel strength testing device. For each MVC, participants squeezed the handles of the device “as hard and fast as possible” for 3-4 seconds. Handgrip peak force and RFD at 0-200 milliseconds were calculated and displayed by the device at the conclusion of each contraction. RESULTS: Reliability analysis revealed that peak force and RFD were highly consistent between sessions, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.950-0.978 and coefficients of variation of 2.7-4.3%. There were significant relationships between sit-to-stand peak power and handgrip peak force (r = 0.485, P = 0.030) and RFD (r = 0.533, P = 0.015). There were also significant relationships between medicine ball throw distance and handgrip peak force (r = 0.634, P = 0.003) and RFD (r = 0.605, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that peak force and RFD were reliable measures for assessing handgrip strength in older women. These measurements were significantly associated with sit-to-stand peak power and medicine ball throw distance and thus, may be effective variables at predicting upper- and lower-body performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158456.12383.36
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability Of Handgrip Strength Measurements And Their Relationship With Physical Performance Outcomes In Older Women

Alexandra L. Khartabil, Ty B. Palmer
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Reliability Of Handgrip Strength Measurements And Their Relationship With Physical Performance Outcomes In Older Women

Alexandra L. Khartabil, Ty B. Palmer
article en

Abstract

Handgrip peak force and rate of force development (RFD) are effective measurements at characterizing the strength capacities of numerous muscle groups in the upper and lower extremities. Previous studies have determined the reliability of handgrip peak force and RFD in young, college-aged adults. However, the reliability of these measurements in older adults remains unclear. It is also unclear if these measurements are associated with performance during sit-to-stand and medicine ball throw tests. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the reliability of handgrip peak force and RFD measurements in older adults. A secondary aim was to determine if these measurements are related to sit-to-stand peak power and medicine ball throw distance. METHODS: Twenty older women (67.8 ± 5.8 years) reported for testing on two different occasions. For each testing session, participants completed five sit-to-stands, three seated medicine ball throws, and three handgrip maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Estimated peak power output was measured during the sit-to-stands using a linear velocity transducer. The distance of each medicine ball throw was recorded with a tape measure. Handgrip MVCs were performed using a novel strength testing device. For each MVC, participants squeezed the handles of the device “as hard and fast as possible” for 3-4 seconds. Handgrip peak force and RFD at 0-200 milliseconds were calculated and displayed by the device at the conclusion of each contraction. RESULTS: Reliability analysis revealed that peak force and RFD were highly consistent between sessions, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.950-0.978 and coefficients of variation of 2.7-4.3%. There were significant relationships between sit-to-stand peak power and handgrip peak force (r = 0.485, P = 0.030) and RFD (r = 0.533, P = 0.015). There were also significant relationships between medicine ball throw distance and handgrip peak force (r = 0.634, P = 0.003) and RFD (r = 0.605, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that peak force and RFD were reliable measures for assessing handgrip strength in older women. These measurements were significantly associated with sit-to-stand peak power and medicine ball throw distance and thus, may be effective variables at predicting upper- and lower-body performance.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Texas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.