The Effect Of Arm Swings On Lower Limb Kinetics During Single-leg Hopping

Single-leg forward hopping for distance was widely used to evaluate knee functions and quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Single-leg vertical hopping for height and backward hopping for distance were found to require more knee involvement compared to forward hopping. There is a lack of consistent task instruction for performing hopping tasks to sensitively monitor knee function following ACL injuries. PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of arm swings on lower limb kinetics during single-leg forward, vertical, and backward hopping with a focus on knee assessment. METHODS: 38 injury-free individuals (21.0 ± 2.3 yrs, 1.7 ± 0.1 m, 68.6 ± 12.9 kg) performed single-leg forward (FH), vertical (VH), and backward (BH) hopping with and without arm swings with motion and force data collected during jumping. Hopping performance, hip/knee/ankle work, and peak power were calculated and compared by three-by-two repeated-measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: BH showed the greatest peak knee power (p < 0.001), smallest hip/ankle work (p < 0.001), and smallest hip/ankle peak power (p < 0.001) compared to FH and VH, regardless of arm swings (Table 1). Arm swings significantly increased hopping performance (p < 0.001) among all tasks but decreased knee work (p = 0.004) in VH and BH (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The greatest peak knee power and smallest peak hip/ankle power and work in BH support the greater emphasis of the knee when hopping backward. Therefore, BH might be an additional task to assess the knee function following ACL injuries compared to FH and VH. Arm swings resulted in greater performance without significantly increasing knee emphasis during jumping. Standardized instructions on controlling arms are recommended when using performances from hopping tasks to assess knee function in rehabilitation progress in patients after ACL injuries. Future studies need to investigate the knee kinetics when hopping in different directions in patients after ACL injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157500.94503.86
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect Of Arm Swings On Lower Limb Kinetics During Single-leg Hopping

Wanyan Su, Yu Gu, Yu Qiu Song, Thanh D. Nguyen et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

The Effect Of Arm Swings On Lower Limb Kinetics During Single-leg Hopping

Wanyan Su, Yu Gu, Yu Qiu Song, Thanh D. Nguyen, N. H. Malik
article en

Abstract

Single-leg forward hopping for distance was widely used to evaluate knee functions and quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Single-leg vertical hopping for height and backward hopping for distance were found to require more knee involvement compared to forward hopping. There is a lack of consistent task instruction for performing hopping tasks to sensitively monitor knee function following ACL injuries. PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of arm swings on lower limb kinetics during single-leg forward, vertical, and backward hopping with a focus on knee assessment. METHODS: 38 injury-free individuals (21.0 ± 2.3 yrs, 1.7 ± 0.1 m, 68.6 ± 12.9 kg) performed single-leg forward (FH), vertical (VH), and backward (BH) hopping with and without arm swings with motion and force data collected during jumping. Hopping performance, hip/knee/ankle work, and peak power were calculated and compared by three-by-two repeated-measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: BH showed the greatest peak knee power (p < 0.001), smallest hip/ankle work (p < 0.001), and smallest hip/ankle peak power (p < 0.001) compared to FH and VH, regardless of arm swings (Table 1). Arm swings significantly increased hopping performance (p < 0.001) among all tasks but decreased knee work (p = 0.004) in VH and BH (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The greatest peak knee power and smallest peak hip/ankle power and work in BH support the greater emphasis of the knee when hopping backward. Therefore, BH might be an additional task to assess the knee function following ACL injuries compared to FH and VH. Arm swings resulted in greater performance without significantly increasing knee emphasis during jumping. Standardized instructions on controlling arms are recommended when using performances from hopping tasks to assess knee function in rehabilitation progress in patients after ACL injuries. Future studies need to investigate the knee kinetics when hopping in different directions in patients after ACL injuries.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.